Which Prime Divisors of 4n^2+4n-1 Are Congruent Modulo 8 to \pm 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TTob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
TTob
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I need to prove that p congruent modulo 8 to \pm 1 for every prime divisor p of 4n^2+4n-1.
4n^2+4n-1 is odd so we have
p \equiv \pm 1,3,5 \pmod{8}

I don't know how to continue from here... I need some hint.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TTob said:
I need to prove that p congruent to \pm 1 for every prime divisor p of 4n^2+4n-1.

Congruent modulo what? 7|(4.5^2+4.5-1), but 7\neq\pm 1(5), so presumably the answer is not n.
 
I need to prove that p congruent modulo 8 to \pm 1.
 
4n^2+4n-1=(2n+1)^2-2=0(p) only if 2 is a quadratic residue mod p which is true only if p=\pm 1(8). (This is proved in any number theory text in the section on quadratic reciprocity.)
 
Martin Rattigan said:
4n^2+4n-1=(2n+1)^2-2=0(p) only if 2 is a quadratic residue mod p which is true only if p=\pm 1(8). (This is proved in any number theory text in the section on quadratic reciprocity.)

Thank you !
 
p \equiv \pm 1,3,5 \pmod{8}

Boy! that was a confusing bunch of stuff. Lot of times, the trouble with a problem is the writer did not correctly organize what he wants to solve. But I see, TTob got it all correct!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top