Which Quantum Mechanics Book Combines Rigor and Mathematical Approach?

AI Thread Summary
An engineering graduate student with a background in computer science seeks recommendations for books on quantum mechanics. The discussion suggests starting with "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" for foundational knowledge, followed by Zettili's book for problem-solving skills. For a deeper understanding, "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development" by Ballentine is recommended due to its mathematical rigor and clear axiomatic approach. The conversation also touches on the merits of Sakurai's work, with some participants expressing that it lacks the mathematical rigor preferred by those with a strong math background. The preference for texts that emphasize mathematical physics is highlighted, indicating a desire for a more structured and rigorous exploration of quantum mechanics.
surds
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello
I am an engineering graduate student , graduating in computer science, I wish to learn more about quantum mechanics.
I am proficient in maths and engineering maths and have a fair amount of knowledge about physics. Please suggest me some books about quantum mechanics, so I can further my knowledge about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bhobba what do you think of Sakurai?
 
At the level of mathematical rigor you liked in Wald's book, reading Sakurai's account of QM would be annoying.
 
Don't like Sakurai - to me it doesn't explain stuff at the level I like ie proceeding with reasonably good mathematical rigor from a small number of axioms that are reasonably well motivated. Ballentine does it with two - I won't spoil it by telling you what they are but the first is pretty much a definition of an observable that can be motivated by requiring basis independence and the second from Gleason's Theorem. When you have gone through it pop on a post and I can explain the detail.

If you like Wald (and for GR its my favorite book as well) I don't think Sakurai will appeal - it lacks rigor.

But I have to say I classify my interests as mathematical physics rather than straight physics because my background is math and computer science so texts with a more mathematical take tend to appeal.

Thanks
Bill
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
644
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Back
Top