Quantum Which quantum mechanics book is better for advanced readers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion compares "The Physics of Quantum Mechanics" by James Binney and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by JJ Sakurai for advanced readers. Binney's book is considered more accessible, suitable for those with a background in vector calculus, while Sakurai is recommended for graduate-level students who already have some knowledge of quantum mechanics. Users suggest that both books have their merits and could be beneficial to have together. Overall, the consensus leans towards Sakurai being more advanced and comprehensive. Both texts serve different levels of understanding in quantum mechanics.
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Binney is the more basic book based on reviews I've seen. They say you can begin reading it if you know Vector Calculus.

Sakarai is better for graduate level as you need to know some QM first.

I'd get both books.
 

Thread 'Opinions/personal experiences on the following four CompSci books'

For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
View full post »

Thread 'Ashcroft and Mermin: revised edition'

Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
View full post »

Thread 'How is Jackson’s Electrodynamics taught during undergraduate?'

I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
View full post »

Similar threads

Quantum Constructing Quantum Mechanics by Duncan
Replies
7
Views
4K
Which book is better in terms of Depth?
Replies
3
Views
2K
High Energy What is the level of Aitchison & Hey's QFT books?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Engineering Need Advice on Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics Textbook
Replies
2
Views
2K
Quantum Advanced Quantum Physics by Paar - Opinions?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Other Learning Real Analysis at My Own Pace
Replies
34
Views
5K
Quantum Have You Read The World According to Quantum Mechanics?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Quantum Clifford Algebra for Quantum Field Theory, Supersymmetry, Supergravity
Replies
3
Views
3K
Quantum Is "Quantum Physics for Dummies" a good textbook for starting QP?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Quantum Better advanced Quantum Mechanics book than Sakurai?
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top