Which Scenario Best Reflects a Conservation of Momentum Graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeremy smith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Desperate Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying which scenario best reflects a conservation of momentum graph, specifically focusing on changes in velocity over time. The scenarios considered include a bullet striking a ballistic pendulum, a head-on car collision, a bullet hitting a stationary object, a swinging pendulum, and a ball rolling on a floor. The consensus leans towards option A, as it aligns with the principles of momentum conservation and energy transfer during the bullet's interaction with the pendulum. Other options are dismissed due to factors like fixed velocities or potential energy losses in collisions. The need for the actual graph is emphasized for a more accurate analysis.
jeremy smith
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Need desperate help! Velocity!

The graph shows the change in the velocity of an object with time in a situation in which momentum is conserved. which of the following situations is most likely indicated by the graph. explain why or why not the situations is or is not the best choice..



Hint: think about conservation of linear momentum and conservation of energy to solve the problem.


A) The velocity of a bullet striking a ballistic pendulum

B) The velocity of a car colliding head on with another car of equal weight and velocity

C) The velocity of a fixed stationary object being hit by a bullet

D) The velocity of a swinging pendulum

E) A ball rolling across a level floor
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'd first cancel out E and D because the question of momentum does not apply...Do you see?I'd also cancel out C,because the object is?Fixed!Its velocity doesn't change and if it does then they would have been irregular energy losses,same applies to B in which we are not so sure the car will bounce back well off the crash,it hasnt been said it is a perfectly elastic collision so practically there would significant energy loss due to heating and friction..That means we remain with A which by me would my choice of the graph!Why do you think so?
 


is it because before the bullet strikes the pendulum the bullet can be assumed to be traveling with constant velocity and after the bullet hits the pendulum there is a huge decrease in velocity because the pendulum is heavy and the change is exponential because the the bullet transfers its energy to the pendulum-bullet system and so it starts oscillating with a small velocity because it's very heavy.
 


jeremy smith said:
is it because before the bullet strikes the pendulum the bullet can be assumed to be traveling with constant velocity and after the bullet hits the pendulum there is a huge decrease in velocity because the pendulum is heavy and the change is exponential because the the bullet transfers its energy to the pendulum-bullet system and so it starts oscillating with a small velocity because it's very heavy.

Sort of...But more so because in most of these cases (ballistic pendulum) conserve both linear momentum and kinetic energy...which was a condition you were required to fulfill in the question!
 


jeremy smith said:
The graph shows the change in the velocity of an object with time in a situation in which momentum is conserved. which of the following situations is most likely indicated by the graph. explain why or why not the situations is or is not the best choice..
Without seeing the actual graph, we cannot offer intelligent advice.

Post the graph and give us your selection and the reasoning behind it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top