Which Sensor Setup Wins the Race: 80ft Wide Field or 20ft Wide Spaceship?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of using an 80ft wide electromagnetic field versus a 20ft wide spaceship for sensor detection in a race scenario. Participants debate whether the spaceship should pass between sensors or if the sensors should detect the spaceship's electromagnetic field. The suggestion of utilizing proven technology like photosensors, commonly used in drag racing, is proposed as a reliable method for determining the winner. There is also a request for clarification on the context, with a mention of potential drone racing applications. Ultimately, the conversation seeks to identify the best sensor setup for accurately detecting the spaceship's width in a competitive environment.
colinbeaton1
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Which is better and how to do it?

Make a spaceship an electromganetic field and go through a sensor so at the end of the race it must pass between the sensors to win, and what sensor would you need for very close width. Saying the spaceship is 20ft wide and both sides must be between the 80ft wide sensor.

Or would you make an 80ft wide electromagnetic field and have the 20ft wide spaceship get sensed?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
colinbeaton1 said:
Which is better and how to do it?

Make a spaceship an electromganetic field and go through a sensor so at the end of the race it must pass between the sensors to win, and what sensor would you need for very close width. Saying the spaceship is 20ft wide and both sides must be between the 80ft wide sensor.

Or would you make an 80ft wide electromagnetic field and have the 20ft wide spaceship get sensed?
I'm not sure I understand the context or the question, but why not just use the proven technology of photosensors? That's used in drag races at the finish line, I believe...
 
colinbeaton1 said:
Which is better and how to do it?

Make a spaceship an electromganetic field and go through a sensor so at the end of the race it must pass between the sensors to win, and what sensor would you need for very close width. Saying the spaceship is 20ft wide and both sides must be between the 80ft wide sensor.

Or would you make an 80ft wide electromagnetic field and have the 20ft wide spaceship get sensed?

Is your question related to drone races? If so please give us your complete list of requirements and we'll try to help.
 
magnetometer ?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top