Which structure is correct according to its name?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the chemical compound Bis(2-ethylhexyl) 1,6-hexan-1,6-diylbiscarbamate and the correct structural representation of its SMILES notation. The initial inquiry presents two SMILES strings, but the responder clarifies that the compound is a bis-carbamate with two ethylhexyl groups attached to a urethane nitrogen, separated by a hexane chain. The responder provides an alternative structural representation but notes that it does not match the original options. Further clarification is sought regarding the correct SMILES notation, leading to the final representation being shared: CCCCC(CC)CN(CC(CC)CCCC)C(=O)OCCCCCCOC(=O)N(CC(CC)CCCC)CC(CC)CCCC. This exchange highlights the complexities of chemical notation and the importance of accurate structural depiction in chemical communication.
cli
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
HI,

A chemical has a name of Bis(2-ethylhexyl) 1,6-hexan-1,6-diylbiscarbamate, I wonder which structure is correct (sorry it seems like I can only paste smile strings, You can see the structures by depicting them on http://www.daylight.com/daycgi_tutorials/depict.cgi):

1.CCCCC(CC)CC(CCCCCOC(N)=O)(CC(CC)CCCC)OC(N)=O

2.C(OC(C[C@@H](CC)CCCC)(C[C@@H](CC)CCCC)CCCCCOC(=O)N)(=O)N

Thanks a lot!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I can't follow your link and I definitely can't make out your notation so, I'll try to answer it without referring to your 2 choices.

It is a bis(2-ethylhexyl) carbamate compound. That part structure is a urethane with two ethylhexyl groups attached to the nitrogen of the urethane.

It is also a bis-carbamate, so there are two of these bis(2-ethylhexyl)-substituted urethanes in the compound. They are separated by an n-hexane chain.

Soooo... if I were to attempt your notation, I would say it was:

(CC(CC)CCCC)2[\sub]NC(=O)O(CCCCCC)OC(=O)N(CC(CC)CCCC)2[\sub]

which isn't one of your choices (I think).

Good luck with it.
 
Hi,

Thank you very much for your help!

I couldn't retrieve the structure for (CC(CC)CCCC)2[\sub]NC(=O)O(CCCCCC)OC(=O)N(CC(CC)CCCC)2[\sub], is this a smile string? Could you please let me know how I can get the structure?

I kind of understand what you mean, just want to double check with the structure to make sure my understanding is correct.
 
It isn't a smile string. It is my attempt to copy what I believed to be your nomenclature.

Note: Where you see "(CC(CC)CCCC)2NC(C=O)..." you should replace with "(CC(CC)CCCC)2NC(C=O)..."


edit: Hmmmm... now the subscript is working!

Here's the SMILES code:

CCCCC(CC)CN(CC(CC)CCCC)C(=O)OCCCCCCOC(=O)N(CC(CC)CCCC)CC(CC)CCCC
 
Last edited:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top