Which systems satisfy Hamiltons principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle Systems
AI Thread Summary
Hamilton's principle, expressed as δI = δ∫Ldt = 0, applies to systems where generalized forces can be represented in a specific mathematical form. This condition is met in electromagnetic systems and those where forces derive from a potential gradient. The discussion raises the question of whether all fundamental forces in nature conform to this framework, suggesting that they do. The complexity in textbooks may arise from attempts to cater to various learning styles, potentially leading to confusion. Overall, the essence of Hamilton's principle lies in its applicability to fundamental forces in nature.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have had similar questions posted, but I am not quite sure on this one and it seems that my textbooks have trouble agreeing completely aswell.

As far as I understand it:

Hamiltons principle:

δI = δ∫Ldt = 0

is only satisfied for systems, where the generalized forces can be put in a form such that the equation:

d/dt(\partialL/\partialq') - \partialL/\partialq = 0

is satisfied. I have seen that this can be done for electromagnetic systems and system in which the force can be written as the gradient of a potential with respect to the position coordinates.

My question is: Are all the fundamental forces observed in nature in a form like this? And is that then the deep content in Hamiltons principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are all the fundamental forces observed in nature in a form like this? And is that then the deep content in Hamiltons principle?
Yes and yes. That would be my understanding too.

Text books are trying to account for different learning styles so they sometimes try too hard.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top