Which Thermodynamics class to take?

AI Thread Summary
When choosing between thermodynamics courses in the chemistry or engineering departments, it's essential to consider the focus and applications of each. The chemistry course is tailored for chemistry and biochemistry majors, while the engineering course caters to various engineering disciplines. The discussion highlights that physicists and chemists approach thermodynamics differently, with physicists often emphasizing statistical mechanics, internal energy, and laws of thermodynamics. The current physics course is described as engineering-focused, suggesting that the engineering class may align better with the student's background. It is recommended to consult an academic advisor for personalized guidance, especially since many physics students face similar decisions. Ultimately, if the courses include statistical mechanics, that could be a deciding factor, with the chemistry course potentially offering a perspective more aligned with physics.
Christine90NY
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm a physics major and I have the option next semester to take thermodynamics in either the chemistry department or the engineering one.
The chem thermo class is taken also by chem and chembio majors and the engineering one is taken by civil, naval, environmental, electrical, and computer engineering majors. Which would be more beneficial for me and what's the difference between thermo applied to chem or applied to engineering?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm taking a thermodynamics class right now, and even though its coded for the physics department, its actually a engineering class. They just call it phys 2H04 for the purpose of physics students, but its actually engphys 2H04. Our class i made up of engineering physics students, physics student, and mechatronics engineering students.

I think chemists and physicists are interested in differnt areas of thermodynamics. So far we have covered, statistical mechanics, internal energy and the 1st law, the 2nd law form the density of states and entropy views.

Probably want the one that's closer to that. I've actually taken a very basic chem thermo class last year that's actually for biochemists, the chem one is quite different, but what we are learning in the one I'm taking now is very differnt from the one I done last year.

Therefore you probably want the engineers one.
 
This is probably a question best answered by your advisor, since I'm guessing this is a problem every physics student at your school runs into.
 
If either of them does an introduction to statistical mechanics, take that one. If not, I'd say that the chemistry one will probably be closer to a physicists take on thermo.
 
will.c said:
If either of them does an introduction to statistical mechanics, take that one. If not, I'd say that the chemistry one will probably be closer to a physicists take on thermo.

I second this.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top