Popular universities for studying Physics are often recognized for their teaching quality rather than research funding. The effectiveness of instruction can vary based on individual interests and teaching styles. Rankings from magazines can provide insights, but they may not reflect personal experiences. For undergraduate studies, affordability is emphasized as a priority over prestige. Ultimately, focusing on a cost-effective option allows students to save money before considering graduate school.
#1
TheShapeOfTime
What are some popular universities that are suppositively really good for Physics? I'm talking about about the teaching, not money for research or whatever .
Each place has its better and less better teachers. But it's often a matter of who teaches what you're interested in a way that suits you personally.
You could also check out the listings magazines publish, but understand that no one can actually try out 10 different bachelor's degree and rank them.
#3
deltabourne
72
0
For undergraduate studies it doesn't really matter. If anything, go to somewhere cheap so you can save money. Then worry about grad school in a couple of years.
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?