I Which x_0 to use in a Taylor series expansion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences in Taylor series expansions when using various points x0, highlighting that the coefficients change based on the derivatives of the function at that point. For the function f(x) = x^2, the Taylor series around x0 = 0 yields different coefficients than when expanded around x0 = 1, despite both representing the same polynomial. It emphasizes that while the second derivative remains constant, the first and zeroth derivatives vary, affecting the series. The conversation also notes that for non-polynomial functions, the behavior of the Taylor series can differ significantly. Understanding these variations is crucial for accurately applying Taylor series in different contexts.
morenopo2012
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I already learn to use Taylor series as:

f(x) = ∑ fn(x0) / n! (x-x0)n

But i don´t see why the serie change when we use differents x0 points.

Por example:

f(x) = x2

to express Taylor series in x0 = 0

f(x) = f(0) + f(0) (x-0) + ... = 0 due to f(0) = (0)2

to x0=1 the series are totally differents

f(x) = 1 + 2(x-1) + (x-1)2 this is the parabola

Why happens this?

and, when we use the Taylor series, which situations we said that we can despreciate some terms, like cuadratic terms?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you calculate both Taylor expansions, you get ##f(x)=x^2## in both cases. I cannot see, whether you did this right as you skipped the term ##\frac{1}{2!}f''(0)\cdot (x-0)^2 =x^2## in the first case. Differentiation is a local property, and a local approximation. Thus it makes sense to study local behavior as in general - other than your example - functions might behave differently at different locations. This becomes especially interesting, if the radius of convergence isn't infinite.
 
A Taylor series is a series in powers of x - a. If you change a, the coefficients will change as well.
If we look at your example of f(x) = x2, the Taylor series in powers of x - 0 (the Maclaurin series), is
##x^2 = 0 + 0x + 1x^2##
Here the coefficients are ##a_0 = 0, a_1 = 0##, and ##a_2 = 1##.

If we look at the Taylor series in powers of x - 2, we have ##x^2 = 4 + 4(x - 2) + 1(x - 2)^2##. The coefficients of this Taylor series are ##a_0 = 4, a_1 = 4##, and ##a_2 = 1##.

If the Taylor series is expanded around some other number, you'll get different values for ##a_0## and ##a_1##, but you'll always get ##a_2 = 1##.
 
For polynomials, the power series will always be the polynomial if you include enough terms (n+1 if the polynomial has degree n). There are other functions where this is not true, e.g. f(x)=1/x.
 
The coefficients of the Taylor series are related to the derivatives of increasing order of the function at the point x0. When you change x0, all the derivative values can change and all the coefficients change.
 
morenopo2012 said:
Por example:

f(x) = x2

to express Taylor series in x0 = 0

f(x) = f(0) + f(0) (x-0) + ... = 0 due to f(0) = (0)2

Instead of that, you should have:

##f(x) = x^2|_{x=0} + (2x)|_{x=0} (x-0) + (2)|_{x=x0} (x-0)^2/2 ##
## = 0 + 0 + x^2 ##
to x0=1 the series are totally differents

f(x) = 1 + 2(x-1) + (x-1)2 this is the parabola

Instead of that, you should have
##f(x) = 1 + 2(x-1) + 2(x-1)^2/2 ##
##= 1 + 2x - 2 + (x^2 - 2x + 1)##
## = x^2 ##

To illustrate you question, you need to pick a function f(x) that is not a polynomial.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top