Who can tell the name of such organism.

  • Thread starter Thread starter BiBByLin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Organism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying a specific chemical compound, 12-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane)-dodecane disulfide, which the original poster wants to purchase. There is confusion regarding the terminology, as the term "organism" typically refers to living entities, not chemical compounds. Suggestions include synthesizing the compound from a related chemical, 12-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane)-dodecanethiol. Clarification is provided that the inquiry should focus on the name of the organic compound rather than an organism. The thread highlights the importance of precise language in scientific discussions.
BiBByLin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
who can tell the name of such organism.

I want to buy it from agency, but I don't know how to call it!

It is very urgent, pls tell me, thx!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
12-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane)-dodecane disulfide.

Good luck finding it...

Perhaps you could make it from 12-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane)-dodecanethiol.
 
Last edited:
thx!
 
BiBByLin said:
who can tell the name of such organism.

I am glad chemisttree was able to help you. But I was wondering (and to help you in case English is not your first language) did you mean to ask, what is the name of that organic compound or molecule?

(hint: organism refers to a living thing such as an animal, plant, fungus or microbe).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top