Who developed this equation, Pauli?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilDSP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pauli
PhilDSP
Messages
643
Reaction score
15
The earliest instance I've seen to this equation, involving the Pauli matrices, is from a 1967 paper by J. M. Levy-Leblond. But it seems general and useful enough that it must have been discovered earlier:

(\sigma \cdot A)(\sigma \cdot B) = A \cdot B + i \sigma \cdot (A \times B)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PhilDSP said:
The earliest instance I've seen to this equation, involving the Pauli matrices, is from a 1967 paper by J. M. Levy-Leblond. But it seems general and useful enough that it must have been discovered earlier:

(\sigma \cdot A)(\sigma \cdot B) = A \cdot B + i \sigma \cdot (A \times B)

Actually, it turns out that this equation is mathematically the same as the equations of geometric algebra, developed by Clifford in the late 1800s, which in turn is a generalization of Hamilton's quaternions.

Pauli introduced spin matrices in 1925, but I'm not sure if he knew about geometric algebras, or whether it was a case of rediscovery.
 
Hi PhilDSP! :smile:
PhilDSP said:
The earliest instance I've seen to this equation, involving the Pauli matrices, is from a 1967 paper by J. M. Levy-Leblond. But it seems general and useful enough that it must have been discovered earlier:

(\sigma \cdot A)(\sigma \cdot B) = A \cdot B + i \sigma \cdot (A \times B)

is 1846 early enough for you?

see http://www.emis.ams.org/classics/Hamilton/OnQuat.pdf for a reprint of william rowan hamilton's original papers

at page 19 of the .pdf (page 16 of the book) …

21. The fundamental rules of multiplication in this calculus give, in the recent notation, for the scalar and vector parts of the product of any two vectors, the expressions …​
… the formula is given, albeit in different notation, essentially AB = S.AB + V.AB = -A.B + iA×B :wink:

(i think this comes originally from The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science (3rd Series), vol. xxix (1846), pp. 26-31, but that volume doesn't seem to be on google e-books yet)
 
Thanks stevendaryl and tiny-tim!

Yes, I have *lots* of material on quaternions and quaternion algebra. But nothing from the original papers by Hamilton so the link provided will be interesting. Levy-Leblond used that equation (with Pauli matrices) to give a derivation of Pauli's linearization of the Schrödinger equation but I'm not sure if Pauli did also.

P.S. According to Wikipedia, Pauli's material is (1927) Zur Quantenmechanik des magnetischen Elektrons Zeitschrift für Physik (43) 601-623. Since I'd have to struggle to understand the paper in German, I'm hesitant to seek it out if it doesn't answer the question posed.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top