Who is the Horse Thief in the Sheriff's Dilemma?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sorry!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
AI Thread Summary
The Sheriff of Nottingham is investigating a horse theft involving three suspects: A, B, and C, each identified as either a Knight (truth-teller), a Liar (always lies), or a Knave (alternates between truth and lies). The suspects make a series of statements that create a complex web of truth and deception. A claims B didn’t do it and later asserts C lied. B insists he is always truthful and claims A lied. C accuses A of being the Knave and states he didn’t commit the theft either. Analyzing these statements allows the Sheriff to deduce the identities of the suspects and ultimately identify the true thief, thereby avoiding a lengthy trial. The scenario emphasizes logical reasoning and deduction in resolving conflicts among characters with different truth-telling behaviors.
Sorry!
Messages
416
Reaction score
0
Here you go:

The Sheriff of Nottingham had rounded up three suspects in the theft of a horse. (To the Sheriff’s dismay though, none of them were Robin Hood!) His informants from the local hamlet market all told him that each of his suspects was either a Knight, a Liar or a Knave, but the information conflicted and he couldn’t be certain just who was who, let alone who actually did it. He did know, however, that a Knight was honour-bound to always tell the truth, a Liar was, well, always a liar, and that Knaves always alternated between telling the truth and a lie.

In order to sort this all out, he put the suspects (A, B and C) in the same room, and told them to each make, in turn, a total of 3 statements, from which the Sheriff hoped to deduce the truth. The suspects stated the following:

A. B didn’t do it!
B. I’m always truthful!
C. A’s the Knave!
A. I didn’t do it!
B. A’s last statement was a lie!
C. B’s last statement was a lie!
A. C’s last statement was a lie!
B. I didn’t do it!
C. Well, I didn’t do it either!

Hm-m-mm! Who was which, and who did the Sheriff conclude actually did it, thereby saving the poor serfs of the Shire the expense of a long and completely unnecessary trial?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C=Knight, A=Knave, B=Liar, B=guilty
:smile:
 
yep :)
 
I think I already read the same teasers as before. The situation and characters are somewhat the same.








-----------------
tease your eyes
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top