Who used a trignometric formula to estimate pi to 16 decimal places?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drez1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manipulation
Drez1985
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How does √(2(2r+r√3) simpilfy to r√(2r+√3) ?

Read about the formula in a book about Jamshid al-Kashi, the great Iranian astronomer who used the above formula to determine pi to 16 decimal places.

All help is much appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you wrote it correctly?
The only two cases when \sqrt{2(2r+r\sqrt 3)}=r\sqrt{2r+\sqrt 3}, are when r=0, or when r=\frac{\sqrt{35+16\sqrt 3}-\sqrt 3}{4}.

Did you mean \sqrt{r(2r^2+\sqrt 3 r)}=r\sqrt{2r+\sqrt 3} ?
 
Yes, I'm sure; I wrote off the formula from a book called "The Age of Genius - 1300-1800" by Michael J. Bradley.

Jamshid al-Kashi used the following trignometric formula (as a way to estimate pi):

C_n=√2(2r+C_(n-1))

where C_1=r√3

By first substituting C_1 into the expression for C_2, supposedly, you will end up with:

C_2 = r√(2r+√3)

Was it any help?

P.s. Sorry for the messy notation, but when pasting from the excel equation writer onto this webpage, strange things happens...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top