I Who's moving towards whom in Doppler effect situations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the Doppler effect in the context of a skydiver emitting sound while descending at terminal velocity. Participants debate whether the skydiver can be considered stationary or if the observer on the ground is moving towards the source. Key points include the importance of the medium (air) in sound propagation and the correct application of Doppler shift formulas, which differentiate between the source and observer's movements. A correction is made regarding the formulas used, clarifying that they were initially presented incorrectly. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the mistake and appreciation for the clarification.
azzarooni88
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
Hello all, (1st post)

I would like some help with deciding if the source is moving towards the observer or vice versa in Doppler effect situations.

The example that I am confused about is a skydiver holding a constant frequency emitting source during the descent. The skydiver is traveling at terminal velocity. His friend is on the ground and hears a frequency that is higher.
I am wondering why we can't treat the example as the skydiver is stationary since he is not accelerating and that his friend (and the Earth) is moving towards him i.e. Observer is moving towards source?

Source is moving towards observer

Formula: fo = (c + vo)/c) fs

where c=speed of sound

Observer is moving towards source

Formula: fo = (c/c-vs) fs

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's the speed of sound, then you need to consider who is moving relative to the air.
 
PeroK said:
If it's the speed of sound, then you need to consider who is moving relative to the air.
Can you elaborate? My lecturer said it had something to do with the medium (air)
 
azzarooni88 said:
Can you elaborate? My lecturer said it had something to do with the medium (air)

The speed of sound (through air) is independent of the speed of the source.
 
azzarooni88 said:
I am wondering why we can't treat the example as the skydiver is stationary since he is not accelerating and that his friend (and the Earth) is moving towards him i.e. Observer is moving towards source?
The classical Doppler shift formula is given in the rest frame of the medium. The relativistic Doppler shift formula is symmetrical so it doesn’t matter.

http://mathpages.com/rr/s2-04/2-04.htm
 
Thanks. But how can we add the velocity of the observer when its the skydiver that's moving?
 
azzarooni88 said:
The example that I am confused about is a skydiver holding a constant frequency emitting source during the descent.

Is it a source of sound waves or a source of electromagnetic waves? Sound waves require a medium, and so the speed of the medium relative to both the emitter and the receiver has an effect. Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium.
 
Mister T said:
Is it a source of sound waves or a source of electromagnetic waves? Sound waves require a medium, and so the speed of the medium relative to both the emitter and the receiver has an effect. Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium.
Right that makes sense and yes it is a source of sound waves. But when we calculate the velocity of the skydiver, why do we use that value as the velocity of the observer?
 
azzarooni88 said:
Source is moving towards observer

Formula: fo = (c + vo)/c) fs

where c=speed of sound

Observer is moving towards source

Formula: fo = (c/c-vs) fs

Cheers

You have got these the wrong way round, by the way.
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
You have got these the wrong way round, by the way.
I have not actually.
 
  • #11
azzarooni88 said:
I have not actually.

Then I am unable to help you any further.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
Then I am unable to help you any further.
look up online doppler equation if you don't believe me
 
  • #13
azzarooni88 said:
look up online doppler equation if you don't believe me

You have a formula where the source is moving with a ##v_o## (velocity of observer) in it. And a formula where the observer is moving with a ##v_s## (velocity of source in it). That is the wrong way round!
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444 and berkeman
  • #14
azzarooni88 said:
Source is moving towards observer

Formula: fo = (c + vo)/c) fs
There is a simple sanity check to see whether this is the right formula. Suppose that the source is moving at the speed of sound. The source will exactly keep up with the transmitted signal. All of the peaks and valleys will pile up on top of one another. Wavelength: 0. Frequency: infinite.

The above formula does not have that feature. It merely doubles the received frequency when the velocity of the source is at the speed of the signal.
Observer is moving towards source

Formula: fo = (c/c-vs) fs
This formula (if properly parenthesized) does have the required feature. If you set v=c then the frequency becomes infinite.

This suggests that @PeroK objected correctly that the formulas are reversed.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and PeroK
  • #15
jbriggs444 said:
There is a simple sanity check to see whether this is the right formula. Suppose that the source is moving at the speed of sound. The source will exactly keep up with the transmitted signal. All of the peaks and valleys will pile up on top of one another. Wavelength: 0. Frequency: infinite.

The above formula does not have that feature. It merely doubles the received frequency when the velocity of the source is at the speed of the signal.

This formula (if properly parenthesized) does have the required feature. If you set v=c then the frequency becomes infinite.

This suggests that @PeroK objected correctly that the formulas are reversed.

Okay I agree. My bad. Thank you for fixing it. I've been wrong about a lot recently
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444 and berkeman
Back
Top