Why am I not getting the correct natural frequency?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the natural frequency of a uniform cantilever beam, where the area moment of inertia, cross-sectional area, and density are not provided. The original poster reports a theoretical natural frequency of 27.44 Hz from lab equipment, while their manual calculations yield significantly lower values, leading to confusion and frustration regarding the discrepancies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for angular frequency and natural frequency, questioning the correctness of the original poster's approach and the impact of unit conversions. There are requests for detailed calculations and clarifications regarding the use of different unit systems.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into potential errors related to unit conversions and the implications of using different measurement systems. Some participants express confusion over the terminology and units, while others offer suggestions for recalibrating the calculations based on consistent units.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of provided values for key parameters such as the area moment of inertia and density, which complicates the calculations. Participants are also grappling with the complexities of converting between different unit systems, including the implications of using pounds versus slugs.

EastWindBreaks
Messages
128
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2017-11-23_1-5-6.png

To find the natural frequency of a uniform cantilever beam, the area moment of inertia, cross-sectional area and density are not given, everything else is given by the lab, our group got a theoretical natural frequency( it might be angular frequency) of 27.44 Hz from lab's computer with the same mass, dimensions and Young's modulus. however, when I try to solve it manually using the natural frequency equation, I got 1.195 as the natural frequency and 7.51 for the angular frequency. which is way off from 27.44, but I should be getting the same value. can someone confirm if my calculation is correct base on the data? I have tried countless times and its driving me crazy. our experimental natural frequency is 24.94, I am not sure how am I gona justify the huge error for the lab report.
2. Relevant equation
upload_2017-11-23_1-5-34.png

ξi=3.516 for Mode 1

upload_2017-11-23_1-8-37.png

I=bh^3/12

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-23_1-5-6.png
    upload_2017-11-23_1-5-6.png
    4 KB · Views: 1,160
  • upload_2017-11-23_1-5-34.png
    upload_2017-11-23_1-5-34.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 986
  • upload_2017-11-23_1-8-37.png
    upload_2017-11-23_1-8-37.png
    674 bytes · Views: 1,004
Physics news on Phys.org
EastWindBreaks said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 215477
To find the natural frequency of a uniform cantilever beam, the area moment of inertia, cross-sectional area and density are not given, everything else is given by the lab, our group got a theoretical natural frequency( it might be angular frequency) of 27.44 Hz from lab's computer with the same mass, dimensions and Young's modulus. however, when I try to solve it manually using the natural frequency equation, I got 1.195 as the natural frequency and 7.51 for the angular frequency. which is way off from 27.44, but I should be getting the same value. can someone confirm if my calculation is correct base on the data? I have tried countless times and its driving me crazy. our experimental natural frequency is 24.94, I am not sure how am I gona justify the huge error for the lab report.
2. Relevant equation
View attachment 215478
ξi=3.516 for Mode 1

View attachment 215479
I=bh^3/12

The Attempt at a Solution

Please post your whole calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
haruspex said:
Please post your whole calculation.

angular frequency of mode 1= (3.516/12.4^2)* sqrt((1*10^7)*(0.000183)/42.86/0.13)
ω= (3.516/12.4^2) * sqrt(328.44)
ω= 0.02287* 18.1229
ω=0.4144

where 0.000183 is the area moment of inertia which came from (bh^3)/12, (1)(0.13^3)/12=0.000183
density=mass/volume=148/(0.13*1*26.56)=42.86

I forgot to square root when I initially post the thread, however, this time, the angular frequency is even smaller.
 
EastWindBreaks said:
angular frequency of mode 1= (3.516/12.4^2)* sqrt((1*10^7)*(0.000183)/42.86/0.13)
ω= (3.516/12.4^2) * sqrt(328.44)
ω= 0.02287* 18.1229
ω=0.4144

where 0.000183 is the area moment of inertia which came from (bh^3)/12, (1)(0.13^3)/12=0.000183
density=mass/volume=148/(0.13*1*26.56)=42.86

I forgot to square root when I initially post the thread, however, this time, the angular frequency is even smaller.
I do not see any units conversion. All the distances are in inches, so that's ok, but you have force in pounds weight and density using grams.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
haruspex said:
I do not see any units conversion. All the distances are in inches, so that's ok, but you have force in pounds weight and density using grams.
oh wow, yeah, I didnt do units conversion because they were all in inches but I totally forgot about grams and lbs. ok so this time, the mass is 0.3263 pound, density= 0.3263/(0.13*1*26.56)= 0.0945 lb/in^3, the new angular frequency I got using this new density is 8.828 Hz, which is still way off...
 
EastWindBreaks said:
the mass is 0.3263 pound,
In E, it is pounds weight, i.e. a force. That has dimension MLT-2. To be consistent, that L needs to be in inches, so you need a factor g in in/s2.
(Why does anyone use a system other than MKS?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
haruspex said:
In E, it is pounds weight, i.e. a force. That has dimension MLT-2. To be consistent, that L needs to be in inches, so you need a factor g in in/s2.
(Why does anyone use a system other than MKS?)
oh right, you mean convert gram to slug right? so, mass= 0.0101412 slug, density = 0.0101412/(0.13*26.56*1)=0.003016 slug/in^3
and I got 49.4 Hz for angular frequency, 7.86 for the natural frequency. still off from 27.44...
yeah, I wish the world can use a single unit system...we have the U.S unit system, SI, and British unit system..
 
EastWindBreaks said:
convert gram to slug right? so, mass= 0.0101412 slug,
I don't think that quite fixes it. The ratio of slug to pound mass, 32 roughly, is based on the value of g when expressed in ft/s2. Your change is equivalent to multiplying the E value by 32, which would be right for converting from pounds weight /sq into lb ft s-2in-2. But everywhere else in your calculation distance are in inches, so you need E in lb s-2 in-1. I.e. rather than express the density in slugs multiply E by 32 x 12.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
Thank you very much! I finally got it, I sometimes completely forgot which unit system is which...the pound force, pound mass, slug are so confusing and unfriendly for students.
upload_2017-11-24_3-11-8.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-24_3-11-8.png
    upload_2017-11-24_3-11-8.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 517

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K