Why are all the OH opposite to each other in D and L glucose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sodium.dioxid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glucose
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the D and L nomenclature for glucose, clarifying that these designations refer to the configuration of the last chiral carbon in the molecule. However, since D- and L-glucose are enantiomers, all stereocenters, including the hydroxyl (OH) groups, are inverted between the two forms. The choice to base the D/L system on the configuration at the fifth carbon (C5) is somewhat arbitrary, as most naturally occurring aldohexoses share the same configuration at this position. This naming convention simplifies the identification of stereoisomers in biochemistry.
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Because D- and L-glucose are enantiomers (i.e. mirror images), their configuration is switched at all stereocenters of the molecule.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
Because D- and L-glucose are enantiomers (i.e. mirror images), their configuration is switched at all stereocenters of the molecule.

This makes sense. But then why do we care about the last chiral carbon?
 
We don't. Like many thing in biology, the choice on how to name the different stereoisomers of glucose is somewhat arbitrary. It just turns out that, if you draw all of the naturally occurring aldohexoses in a Fisher projection, almost all of them have the same configuration about C5, so biochemists chose that position to use as the basis for the D/L nomenclature system.
 
You are too kind, sir.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top