Why Are BJTs Considered Cheaper to Operate Than FETs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bjt Fet
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that BJTs are universally cheaper to operate than FETs. It emphasizes that such comparisons lack merit without considering specific circuit applications and the types of transistors involved. Circuit design plays a crucial role in determining the appropriate transistor choice, as BJTs may be advantageous in some scenarios while FETs excel in others. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the context and specifics of each application, including the differences between JFETs, MOSFETs, and BJTs in analog circuits. Ultimately, a blanket statement about operating costs is misleading without detailed analysis.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
why are people saying BJTs are cheaper to OPERATE?

the field effect devices require less current and should therefore cost less no?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
what people ? where ?

any links to that ?

Dave
 
The original statement is a lot like saying "Fords get better gas mileage than Chevys", without any other information provided. You can't make this type of comparison without talking about the type of circuit (the application), the type of BJT & FETs involved, and possibly several other things, so the statement itself has no merit.

Circuit design dictates transistor choice, and in some cases, BJTs may be the preferred transistor, while in others, FETs are a much better option (for any number of reasons but not usually "operating cost").
 
As others have said, you can not generalize. There are certain applications where BJTs are better while others where FETs are better. You have to talk about specifics of the application. And add into JFETs vs. MOSFETs vs. BJTs in analog circuits generally.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top