Why Are Eigenvalues of Unitary Operators Pure Phases?

black_hole
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We only briefly mentioned this in class and now its on our problem set...

Show that all eigenvalues i of a Unitary operator are pure phases.
Suppose M is a Hermitian operator. Show that e^iM is a Unitary operator.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Uf = λf where is is an eigenfunction, U dagger = U inverse
multiply by either maybe...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uf = λf

denote your inner product (a,b)

a.
(f, U^\dagger U f) = ?
calculate this two ways (in terms of λ and λ*)
(f, U^\dagger U f ) = (Uf, Uf) = ?
(f, U^\dagger U f ) = (f, f) [since U^\dagger = U^{-1} ]
so what does this say about λ and λ*?

b.
The second part follows from

1. \left( e^A \right)^\dagger<br /> = \left( 1 + A + \frac{1}{2!}A^2 + \cdots \right)^\dagger<br /> = \left( 1 + A^\dagger + \frac{1}{2!}(A^\dagger)^2 + \cdots \right)<br /> = e^{(A^\dagger)}.

2. For commuting matrices (operators)
e^A e^B = e^{(A+B)} .

now you need to show show U = e^(iM) satisfies UU^(dagger) = 1.

can you fill in the rest?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top