Why Are Holes in Semiconductors Heavier and Less Mobile Than Electrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cheetox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Holes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the properties of holes in semiconductors, specifically why they are considered heavier and less mobile compared to electrons. The subject area pertains to semiconductor physics and charge carrier dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of holes as the absence of electrons and question the implications of effective mass versus real mass in relation to mobility. There is also a discussion about the propagation of holes and the misconceptions surrounding their mass.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering different perspectives on the nature of holes and their effective mass. Some guidance has been provided regarding the distinction between effective and real mass, but there is no clear consensus on the explanations offered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating complex concepts related to semiconductor physics, including the definitions and behaviors of charge carriers. There are indications of potential misunderstandings regarding the relationship between holes and the atoms they are associated with.

Cheetox
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


give a simple argument which will explain why holes in semiconductors are generally heavier and less mobile than electrons.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Is it something to do with the fact that the hole represents the movements of a lot of electrons rather than just one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, a hole is what's left behind when an electron leaves an atom. It's just a charged atom.
 
Ok so how do you then explain why holes are generally heavier?
 
I'm not sure really but perhaps you should talk about it being an effective mass as opposed to a real mass which is determined by the tendency of an electron to jump from atom to atom (in a particular direction) and that this gives rise to effective masses that are often several times that of a free electron? Sorry if this is too crude an answer but that's the kind of direction I would go in.

Maybe you should back this up with a discussion of the tensor or scalar expressions for the effective mass.

Does anyone disagree?
 
ideasrule said:
No, a hole is what's left behind when an electron leaves an atom. It's just a charged atom.

The first sentence is correct. The second sentence is not. The hole is not the charged atom, it is the empty space on the charged atom that once contained an electron. When a hole moves it is not the charged atom that is moving; the hole moves by virtue of an electron from another atom leaving that atom to fill the hole, but in effect leaving another hole in its original atom. This is how the hole propagates, so the suggestions that you should compare the electron mass to the mass of the atom it leaves behind is misleading - it gives the impression that the hole mass should be the atom's mass minus an electron, which I doubt is true.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K