Why are London dispersion forces attractive?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fedaykin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dispersion Forces
AI Thread Summary
London dispersion forces, also known as induced dipole-induced dipole interactions, are always attractive. These forces arise from transient dipoles formed when electrons are unevenly distributed within a molecule, which then induce dipoles in nearby molecules. The induced dipoles align in a way that results in attraction, similar to how bar magnets align to attract rather than repel. This fundamental characteristic of London forces clarifies that they do not exhibit repulsive interactions.
fedaykin
Messages
136
Reaction score
3
I've looked around in my basic chemistry books and haven't seen this directly answered, and I'm having trouble with it on the internet too.

Wouldn't said force be repulsive just as often as attractive and therefore have no net force?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
London forces are considered both attractive and repulsive fedaykin!
Hope that helps.
 
No Ed, London dispersion forces are always attractive. These are also known as induced dipole-induced dipole interactions. In one molecule, a transient dipole can be formed from there temporarily being more electrons on one side of the atom/molecule than the other. This transient dipole will then induce a dipole (uneven distribution of electrons) in a nearby atom/molecule. This induced dipole in the second molecule will always point in the same way as the dipole of the first molecule, resulting in an attractive interaction. A dipole will never induce a dipole that results in a repulsive interaction (as an analogy, putting a bar magnet next to another bar magnet will never cause the second magnet to align itself to repel itself from the first magnet).
 
Ah, thank you very much. I'm trying to become more diligent in my reading. That's hard for me, especially at 3:00 a.m.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top