Why Are My Phase Voltages the Same in This Motor Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter milesyoung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Nuts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a wye-connected motor circuit with an open neutral, where the user initially seeks to prove that the ratios of back EMF to current are equal across phases. However, they later realize that this cannot be proven due to an error in their simulation. The user concludes that the phase voltages are the same in a passive circuit with equal impedances because the sum of the phase voltages equals zero when back EMFs also sum to zero. This realization clarifies the behavior of the circuit and resolves the user's confusion. The thread highlights the importance of understanding circuit behavior in relation to phase voltages and back EMFs.
milesyoung
Messages
818
Reaction score
67
Hi,

I have attached a diagram of a wye connected motor load with open neutral. The circuit shows an inverter state with a DC-bus voltage from terminal A to G (ground). The following equations should hold:

V_AN = Z*Ia + Ea
V_GN = Z*Ib + Eb
V_GN = Z*Ic + Ec
Ia + Ib + Ic = 0
Ea + Eb + Ec = 0 (back EMFs sum to zero)

I want to prove that:

Ea/Ia = Eb/Ib = Ec/Ic

which would mean, according to:

V_AN/Ia = Z + Ea/Ia
V_GN/Ib = Z + Eb/Ib
V_GN/Ic = Z + Ec/Ic

that the impedance + back EMF in each phase can be replaced by the same effective impedance. I have verified this by simulation in LTspice.

This is probably very simple, but it has been bothering me all day. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 3phase.jpg
    3phase.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 516
Engineering news on Phys.org
Err, so I made a huge mistake when I did the simulation, Ea/Ia = Eb/Ib = Ec/Ic can't be proven because it doesn't hold :>

I was wondering why the phase voltages for the circuit I posted were the same for a passive circuit with equal phase impedances. This is naturally due to the fact that the phase voltages sum to zero in both cases (when back EMFs sum to zero):

V_AN + 2*V_GN = Z*Ia + Ea + Z*Ib + Eb + Z*Ic + Ec = Z(Ia + Ib + Ic) + Ea + Eb + Ec =>

V_AN + 2*V_GN = 0

which would be the same for the passive circuit.

If you took the time to mull over this, thank you, apologies :)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top