B Why Are Numerical Examples Rare in Relativity and Quantum Mechanics?

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
It's rare to encounter concrete, numerical examples of what is being taught about Relativity, Quantum Mechanics.. On the other hand there's plenty of numerical examples in the undergraduate general physics textbooks, for instance problems of mechanics.

As for General Relativity I did find only a few, and that was on Weinberg's book: tests of General Relativity (deflection of light by sun, etc...)

Is there a reason for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess one possibility is that GR QFT and QM textbooks are intended to experienced students, and if they want a numerical example they are capable of working out their own from what is being taught on the book as opposed to undergrad textbooks where students are not so smart.

Other possibility is that complicated differential equations and non standard integrals are typically involved in GR QFT and QM and actually getting results is difficult and would require a lot of space?
 
kent davidge said:
I guess one possibility is that GR QFT and QM textbooks are intended to experienced students, and if they want a numerical example they are capable of working out their own from what is being taught on the book as opposed to undergrad textbooks where students are not so smart.

"Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity" by Hartle has quite a few end-of-chapter problems, e.g., in the three pages that I have attached, there are at least 14 numerical problems.[/QUOTE]
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Mechanics including thermo-, fluid- , elastic-, statistical- , and electromagnetism are gone into the phase of application. Relativity and QM are following them.
 
You are contradicting yourself. If electromagnetism is applied then also relativity is applied since electromagnetism is the paradigmatic example of a relativistic field theory, and this was so even before even its discoverer, Maxwell and the rest of the physics community was aware of it ;-)). SCNR.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top