Why are photons emitted when electrons drop energy levels

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms behind photon emission when electrons transition between energy levels, particularly in the context of fluorescence. Participants explore theoretical explanations, including classical and quantum mechanics, and the implications of energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why photons are emitted when electrons drop energy levels, questioning the underlying mechanisms.
  • Another participant suggests that energy conservation necessitates the emission of something when electrons transition, implying a connection to electromagnetism.
  • A classical perspective is introduced, where an oscillating electron around a nucleus is said to produce electromagnetic waves, leading to photon emission, although this view is acknowledged as overly simplistic.
  • A participant challenges the idea that oscillating electrons would emit photons constantly, asking what specifically triggers photon emission during energy level decay.
  • It is noted that for photon emission to occur, the electron must change energy levels, and if lower levels are occupied, emission cannot happen.
  • A model of the electron as a standing wave is presented, emphasizing that energy changes can only occur between permitted energy states.
  • Questions about spontaneous emission are raised, with participants seeking to understand its causes and the probabilities involved in electron transitions.
  • Examples of radiation emission from charged particles in different contexts, such as synchrotron and bremsstrahlung radiation, are mentioned, highlighting that these phenomena involve different mechanisms compared to atomic transitions.
  • A metaphor involving a twisted tablecloth is used to illustrate the relationship between local changes and the necessity of gauge bosons, represented by photons, although this explanation is noted to be complex.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanisms of photon emission, with no consensus reached on a singular explanation. Multiple competing theories and models are presented, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to classical and quantum mechanics, with limitations in understanding the full implications of energy states and the nature of spontaneous emission remaining unresolved.

TungstenTesla
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

So I'm doing some research on fluorescence and I'm puzzled. I understand that running a current through fluorescent gasses like neon cause the valence electrons to jump up an energy level, and I understand that photons are emitted when they fall back down into their default energy level. What I don't understand is WHY these photons are emitted.

I'm told by friends not to ask such questions, and that there is no answer to this yet. Is this true? Does anyone out there have any theories?

I'm fascinated how the electric current and the energy level jump/decay can produce a photon. But I don't understand the mechanisms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really comes from an understanding of electromagnetism. However just on the basis of energy conservation you could see that something has to be emitted to conserve energy.
 
Consider classical picture. It's completely wrong, but it can work as a starting point. An electron is orbiting a nucleus. It has an electric charge. As the electron goes around, the net charge is oscillating around the nucleus. An oscillating charge produces an electromagnetic wave. Hence, a photon is emitted.

Of course, things aren't nearly as simple, since electron isn't really orbiting the nucleus. Still, it has a charge, and in general, an angular momentum. The electron will therefore still interact with electromagnetic field. Deriving correct expressions here is complicated, and finding even numerical solutions is very complex, but you end up seeing the same thing in the end. An oscillating electric dipole gives rise to electromagnetic wave.
 
I get that the electron oscillating around the nucleus creates an electromagnetic wave, but if this alone is what emitted the photon, wouldn't photons be emitted constantly due to all electrons constantly orbiting around their nuclei?

What is it about the decay, what is it about the electron jumping back down to its "resting" energy level that emits the photon?

And why are photons emitted in the presence of electromagnetic waves? There are lots of electromagnetic waves that don't emit photons, right?
 
In order for the photon to be emitted, the energy of the electron needs to change. If the electron cannot decrease its energy because all lower energy levels are occupied, it cannot emit anything.

Yes, it sounds a bit counterintuitive from perspective of classical mechanics, but this is quantum mechanics for you.
 
The link to quantum mechanics is to consider the electron, bound to an atom, as a sort of standing wave. The standing wave needs to have a whole number of nodes in order to be sustained (like on a string). In that model, it can't just dribble away energy and spiral inwards. It can only lose or gain energy if the jump corresponds to the difference in energy between two 'permitted', energy states (standing wave modes).
 
The question is about Spontaneous Emission, isn't it? Can anyone supply the cause of spontaneous emission?
 
Note that an electron or proton or any ionized particle will also emit radiation(photons), say being spun at relativistic speeds in a particle accelerator and slowed down. 'Synchotron radiation' 'Bremsstrahlung radiation' if I got that right.
 
Phrak said:
The question is about Spontaneous Emission, isn't it? Can anyone supply the cause of spontaneous emission?

Following on from post #6. If an electron is in an energy state higher than its lowest (base) state then it is not stable. There is a probability of it falling into a lower state. when it does, it emits the characteristic frequency of em. Understanding what actually governs this probability is more 'second / third year' work on QM.
 
  • #10
crapworks said:
Note that an electron or proton or any ionized particle will also emit radiation(photons), say being spun at relativistic speeds in a particle accelerator and slowed down. 'Synchotron radiation' 'Bremsstrahlung radiation' if I got that right.

In those cases, there is a continuum of possible energy states for the electron to exist in so you can get a continuum of possible transitions and, hence, emitted frequencies. An electron can gradually lose / transfer its energy and keep emitting em under those conditions. The Hydrogen Atom model is not a relevant explanation for all phenomena.
 
  • #11
Popular books usually explain it using the twisted table cloth. To change things locally you need wrinkles where it joins up to the rest of the expanse. The whole idea is that the conservation of electric charge requires gauge bosons to exist, and these are our photons. It's not easily explained in a sentence! But taking it to an extreme, I might try a Haiku:

[pre]
Since charge is local
For symmetry to prevail
Light will force itself
[/pre]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K