Why Are Polar Coordinates Essential in Solving the Ant and Rubber Band Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of polar coordinates in the context of the Ant and Rubber Band problem, exploring why certain coordinate systems may be more advantageous than others for solving the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the feasibility of using Cartesian coordinates versus polar coordinates, questioning the implications of different frames of reference. Some express confusion about Lagrangian coordinates and their relevance to the problem. Others suggest that understanding the problem may involve more than just equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various hints and suggestions regarding the use of different coordinate systems. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the problem and the potential approaches, while others have expressed uncertainty about specific concepts. There is an ongoing exploration of ideas without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of relevant equations and the potential for misunderstanding the problem's requirements. There is also a reference to the Socratic method as a means of exploring the problem conceptually.

IamVector
Messages
98
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
An ant is moving along a rubber band at velocity
v = 1 cm/s. One end of the rubber band (the one from which

the ant started) is fixed to a wall, the other (initially at dis-
tance L = 1 m from the wall) is pulled at u = 1 m/s. Will the

ant reach the other end of the band? If yes then when will it
happen?
Relevant Equations
approach is : we can use the relative position on
the band which fraction k of the rubber is left behind starts with k = 0, and k = 1 corresponds to the ant reaching the end of the band .
why can't we use Cartesian coordinates and in which way to proceed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show the Relevant Equations and show your work on this, or your thread will be deleted. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
berkeman said:
Please show the Relevant Equations and show your work on this, or your thread will be deleted. Thank youl
ok
 
IamVector said:
why can't we use Cartesian coordinates
You can use whatever coordinates you like, but sometimes it is easier to use a frame of reference that is moving. Sometimes, even using a noninertial frame is easiest.
 
haruspex said:
You can use whatever coordinates you like, but sometimes it is easier to use a frame of reference that is moving. Sometimes, even using a noninertial frame is easiest.
the hint given is related to using Lagrangian coordinates but I don't have any idea what they are.
 
IamVector said:
the hint given is related to using Lagrangian coordinates but I don't have any idea what they are.
http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Lagrangian_coordinates
Imagine that the band starts out marked in some equal intervals. Of course, the gap between them grows as the band is stretched, so in these units the ant slows down.
How fast is the ant going, in these units, at time t?
 
IamVector said:
the hint given is related to using Lagrangian coordinates but I don't have any idea what they are.
You don't have ANY idea what they are? Have you searched google or Wikipedia?
If you ask a specific question you may get an answer here, but this sounds like giving up.
"Solve my problem for me" isn't likely to work here.
You've gotten some good hints here, work with those and ask about what confuses you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
DaveE said:
You don't have ANY idea what they are? Have you searched google or Wikipedia?
If you ask a specific question you may get an answer here, but this sounds like giving up.
"Solve my problem for me" isn't likely to work here.
You've gotten some good hints here, work with those and ask about what confuses you.
Hmm got the answer
Ant cover Vdt distance in dt time and final length of rubberband = L+ut
So dk = Vdt/(L+ut) on taking integrals and putting values t = e^100 - 1
[thread closed]
 
IamVector said:
Hmm got the answer
Ant cover Vdt distance in dt time and final length of rubberband = L+ut
So dk = Vdt/(L+ut) on taking integrals and putting values t = e^100 - 1
[thread closed]
Yes, that's good. To put it into a Lagrangian coordinates view you would say that speed of the ant in those coordinates is ##\frac{L V}{L+ut}##, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: IamVector
  • #10
Am I wrong to say you don't need any equations for this question?
 
  • #11
epenguin said:
Am I wrong to say you don't need any equations for this question?
Not sure how you are going to arrive at time =##\frac Lu(e^{\frac uV}-1)## without using equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: epenguin
  • #12
haruspex said:
Not sure how you are going to arrive at time =##\frac Lu(e^{\frac uV}-1)## without using equations.

I bet Galileo could do it. I think it involves an imaginary conversation where two rational people continually insult the village idiot while saying “therefore” a lot.
 
  • #13
Cutter Ketch said:
I bet Galileo could do it. I think it involves an imaginary conversation where two rational people continually insult the village idiot while saying “therefore” a lot.
what does that even mean XD??
 
  • #14
IamVector said:
what does that even mean XD??

Galileo (and most philosophers for many hundreds of years before him) used the Socratic method. His observations were published in the form of dialogues between a wise teacher and two students: one a neutral inquisitive person and the other a devil’s advocate always making counter arguments for the teacher to shred. He was tellingly named ‘Simplicio’. In these dialogues instead of equations the relations are spelled out using language, so, for example you will find quotes like this,

“ The spaces described by a body falling from rest with a uniformly accelerated motion are to each other as the squares of the time intervals employed in traversing those distances.”

So I was jokingly saying Galileo would find a way to say it all with words and he would do so in the Socratic form.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #15
Cutter Ketch said:
Galileo (and most philosophers for many hundreds of years before him) used the Socratic method. His observations were published in the form of dialogues between a wise teacher and two students: one a neutral inquisitive person and the other a devil’s advocate always making counter arguments for the teacher to shred. He was tellingly named ‘Simplicio’. In these dialogues instead of equations the relations are spelled out using language, so, for example you will find quotes like this,

“ The spaces described by a body falling from rest with a uniformly accelerated motion are to each other as the squares of the time intervals employed in traversing those distances.”

So I was jokingly saying Galileo would find a way to say it all with words and he would do so in the Socratic form.
of course I knew you were joking but what was the need? I thought something triggered you XD
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
Not sure how you are going to arrive at time =##\frac Lu(e^{\frac uV}-1)## without using equations.
You are right, I had hastily misread the questio.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: IamVector
  • #17
epenguin said:
You are right, I had hastily misread the questio.
Np
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K