Why are real life process irreversible

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of irreversibility in thermodynamic processes, exploring why certain processes cannot be reversed even if energy is lost to the surroundings. Participants examine examples and definitions related to reversible and irreversible processes, including the implications of energy exchange and work done on systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that all thermodynamic processes are irreversible due to energy loss to surroundings but questions why energy cannot be returned to the system to reverse the process.
  • Another participant argues that if energy is added, the system is no longer closed, implying that the conditions of the system change.
  • A different viewpoint is presented, using the example of a campfire to illustrate that energy cannot flow back from the ambient air to CO2, emphasizing the directionality of energy flow and temperature differences.
  • Another participant clarifies that irreversibility is a technical term, stating that processes losing energy to the environment can still be reversible under certain conditions.
  • One participant reiterates the initial question about energy addition and discusses the nature of reversible processes, explaining that reversibility is defined by the ability to return to equilibrium with infinitesimal changes, regardless of energy dissipation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of reversible and irreversible processes. There is no consensus on the conditions under which processes can be considered reversible, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between energy loss and reversibility.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific examples and definitions from thermodynamics, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of energy transfer and the conditions necessary for reversibility.

cnidocyte
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
From what I've read all processes of a thermodynamic system are irreversible because some energy will be lost to the surroundings but I don't understand why that can't be reversed by getting the surroundings to put that energy back into the system. Let's say I have a gas canister with a piston and there's a pile of sand weighing the piston down and compressing the gas to a certain degree. If I quickly take away half of the sand the piston will move up then fluctuate a bit until thermodynamic equilibrium is restored. In real life the friction between the piston and the canister will cause some energy to be dissipated into the surroundings so if I put the sand back on the piston the energy of the gas won't be exactly the same as it was at the start. Whats stopping me from adding more energy to the gas though? Sorry if this seems like a stupid question, thermodynamics isn't a strong point of mine.
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you're adding more energy then the system is no longer closed.
 
I don't think your example is adequate to understand this. You are doing work to move the sand, so the energy in the gas can easily be added back. However, this is NOT a reversible process as the reactions in your body that allow you to move the sand cannot be reversed.

For example, let's look at a campfire. The O2 in the air is reacting with the Carbon in the wood and turning into CO2 and releasing energy. The ambient air is at best now equal in temperature to the CO2. Why can't this be reversed? Because there is no way for the energy to flow from the air back into the CO2 to split it up! Heat will not flow from a colder substance to a warmer one so the CO2 and the air stay equal in temp.

See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreversibility

I'm not sure if that is 100% correct in regards to thermodynamics, but I believe the general idea is right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
cnidocyte said:
From what I've read all processes of a thermodynamic system are irreversible because some energy will be lost to the surroundings but I don't understand why that can't be reversed by getting the surroundings to put that energy back into the system. Let's say I have a gas canister with a piston and there's a pile of sand weighing the piston down and compressing the gas to a certain degree. If I quickly take away half of the sand the piston will move up then fluctuate a bit until thermodynamic equilibrium is restored. In real life the friction between the piston and the canister will cause some energy to be dissipated into the surroundings so if I put the sand back on the piston the energy of the gas won't be exactly the same as it was at the start. Whats stopping me from adding more energy to the gas though? Sorry if this seems like a stupid question, thermodynamics isn't a strong point of mine.
What the output work of the process is used for is immaterial to whether the process is reversible. A reversible thermodynamic process can do work that is dissipated as heat. And a non-reversible process can do work that is completely conserved.

A reversible process is one whose direction can be reversed at any time by an infinitessimal change in conditions: ie. it is arbitrarily close to equilibrium at all times. Reversibility does not depend on what you do with the work output.

If you store the output of a Carnot engine operating between two heat reservoirs (say, by lifting a weight), and reverse the direction of the Carnot cycle (by changing the conditions by an infinitessimal amount) you create a Carnot refrigerator that can be driven by the stored work to return the system and surroundings (the reservoirs) to their original thermodynamic states. If the engine uses an irreversible process, you will never be able to get back to the original state using just the stored work output of the engine.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K