I Why Are Star Spectra Shown as Absorption Rather Than Emission?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter nmsurobert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Stars
AI Thread Summary
Star spectra are typically shown as absorption rather than emission because the light we observe is primarily continuous black-body radiation from the star's plasma, with specific wavelengths absorbed by the stellar atmosphere. The absorption lines indicate which wavelengths are removed from this continuum as photons escape through the atmosphere, influenced by the star's composition and ionization levels. The effective temperature of the star's photosphere determines the continuous spectrum, while the absorption features provide insight into the atmospheric conditions. This process is dictated by the physics of the star, not by arbitrary choice. Understanding this distinction clarifies the nature of stellar spectra.
nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36
I understand the process of electron transitions but I don't understand how or why these pictures are put together. If we're looking at the spectra of a star, why are this pictures shown as absorption spectra and not emission?
spec_with_temp.gif
 

Attachments

  • spec_with_temp.gif
    spec_with_temp.gif
    82.6 KB · Views: 1,082
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This is the spectrum of the light that actually comes from the star. We don't get to choose whether emission or absorption dominates - the physics of the star determines that. Most of the light from the star is continuous black-body radiation from the stellar plasma and not from atomic emission lines. The absorption lines remove some of this continuum spectrum.
 
  • Like
Likes unusually_wrong, Klystron and lomidrevo
The terminology can be confusing sometimes, indeed. The spectrum of a typical star is continuous, determined by the effective temperature of the photosphere of the star. However, there are absorption spectral lines superimposed on this continuum, because photons of some specific wavelengths are being absorbed as trying to escape through the stellar atmosphere. The absorption spectrum is determined by the composition of the atmosphere and by the level of ionization.
 
ahhh that makes total sense. thank you guys!

i usually do a solid hour of digging before i consult the experts. thanks guys!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top