Why are there different rate constants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluepen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Rate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the rate constant (k) for a first-order decomposition reaction of substance A, using concentration data over time. Two calculations yield slightly different values for k: 0.0998 min-1 at t = 1 minute and 0.100 min-1 at t = 4 minutes. The discrepancy raises questions about potential experimental errors in measuring concentration, with participants noting that the difference is minimal (0.2% error), suggesting that such variations are often acceptable in experimental contexts. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precision in measurements while acknowledging that small differences in calculated values can occur in practical scenarios.
bluepen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey,

The decomposition of A is first order, and [A] is monitored. The following data are recorded:
t / min 0 1 2 4
[A]/[M] 0.100 0.0905 0.0819 0.0670

Calculate k.

Using [A] = [A]0e-kt,

Calculating at t = 1
0.0905 = 0.1e-k(1)
0.905 = e-k
-0.0998=-k
k = 0.0998 min-1

Calculating at t = 4
0.0670 = 0.1e-k(4)
0.67 = e-k(4)
k = 0.100 min-1

How can this be!? :confused:
The question is an example from http://http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c123/intratel.html"

Thanks,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Experimental error in measuring the concentration? 0.1 and 0.0998 aren't that far apart.
 
In most experiments I would consider 0.1 and 0.0998 to be the same - 0.2% error is relatively small.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top