Why b^[log (base b) a ] is = a ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter garyljc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation b^[log (base b) a] = a is defined as b^[log_b a] ≡ a, meaning it is true by definition rather than something that can be proven. The logarithm definition states that log_b x = y if and only if b^y = x, establishing the foundational relationship. Since definitions serve as the basis for mathematical concepts, they cannot be proven like theorems. An analogy is drawn to the relationship between inches and feet, which also cannot be proven but is accepted as a definition. Understanding this distinction is crucial in mathematics.
garyljc
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone could show me why b^[log (base b) a ] is = a ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The equation

b^{\log_b a} = a

is better written as

b^{\log_b a} \equiv a

In other words, the equality is true by definition.
 


D H said:
The equation

b^{\log_b a} = a

is better written as

b^{\log_b a} \equiv a

In other words, the equality is true by definition.

is it possible to prove it ? like simplify it then showed that it is equal to a ?
 


It is not possible to prove a definition, and the standard definition of \log_b x is

\log_b x = y \,\Leftrightarrow \, b^y = x
 


garyljc said:
is it possible to prove it ? like simplify it then showed that it is equal to a ?

You don't prove definitions. They are the foundational building blocks that provide meanings. As an analogy, a dictionary is more or less a long list of word and definition pairs.

A simpler example than the one you posted is: 12 inches = 1 foot. This equation defines the relationship between inches and feet and is not something that is proved.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top