Why can we write this? (maths)

Thread starter atomqwerty
Start date Dec 26, 2010

Dec 26, 2010

atomqwerty

Hi,

why can we write the relation of the imagehttp://img413.imageshack.us/i/formulal.jpg/(Where it says 'La integral de corriente es...')

Thank you!

Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2010

Physics news on Phys.org

Engineers develop a magnetic transistor for more energy-efficient electronics
New tensor network-based approach could advance simulation of quantum many-body systems
Ultrafast magnetization switching: Moving boundary challenges previous all-optical switching models

Dec 26, 2010

Dickfore

Integration by parts.

Dec 29, 2010

Chopin

Dickfore said:

Integration by parts.

Along with the fact that \Psi goes to 0 at infinity.

Dec 29, 2010

Fredrik

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Insights Author

Gold Member

Most of the details can be found in this thread.

Jan 18, 2011

atomqwerty

Thanks to all!

Thread 'Is a table levitating possible, even at a minuscule probability?'

I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

View full post »

Thread 'Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay'

If a particle decays into two gamma rays, what is the energy time uncertainty? ΔEΔt = h bar or ΔEΔt = h bar/2 Please explain.

View full post »

Thread 'Commutation of operators for particle in a box'

I would like to know how to calculate the ##[\hat{H}, \hat{P}]## for a particle in a 1D box? At the first glance it seems that they commute but they don't get diagonalized in identical basis. How to calculate this commutation?

View full post »