Why canal rays need a perforated cathode?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ananthu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cathode Rays
AI Thread Summary
Canal rays require a perforated cathode to penetrate and produce fluorescence on the opposite side due to their positive ion nature, which prevents them from passing through solid materials. In contrast, cathode rays, composed of electrons, can create fluorescence on the anode walls without needing a perforation, as they are lighter and scatter more easily. The fluorescence observed near the anode is primarily due to scattered electrons rather than direct interaction with the anode. The interaction of cathode rays with the anode depends on the energy of the particles; lower energy results in minimal scattering, while higher energy increases scattering. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why perforation is essential for canal rays but not for cathode rays.
ananthu
Messages
105
Reaction score
1
In the cathode ray production experiment, at about .01 mm of Hg, cathode rays travel from cathode and move towards anode and produce fluorescence on the walls near the anode.At the same time canal rays also move towards cathode. But only when you use a perforated cathode, the canal rays penetrate through it and produce fluorescence at the back of the cathode. I have doubts on the following aspects of the above experiment.
We are not using any perforated anode in the case of cathode ray production. Still these rays are able to produce fluorescence on the walls near the anode, thus indicating their presence. But why, the canal rays or the anode rays, so to speak, do need a perforated cathode to reach the other side and produce glow on the fluorescence screen kept at the back of the perforated cathode? Can not the anode rays make the walls near the cathode, glow even without a perforation in the cathode, as the cathode rays did?

As I am not able find the reason for it, it will be of great help to me if some experts on the subject throw some light on this aspect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Canal rays are positive ions, while cathode rays are electrons or other negative ions.

None of them make it through if there are no holes ... the anode and the cathode are usually much too thick for particles to pass through; even a micron is too thick!

The fluorescence you see on the walls is from scattered electrons; they are much lighter than the positive ions, and hence scatter much more easily.
 
Thanks for the reply.Sorry for my delayed response.

UltrafastPED said:
Canal rays are positive ions, while cathode rays are electrons or other negative ions.

The fluorescence you see on the walls is from scattered electrons; they are much lighter than the positive ions, and hence scatter much more easily.

Regarding the above statement, I could understand the light rays being scattered by an object. But how does it happen in the case of cathode rays? The latter being negative, when they hit the positive anode, will they not be attracted towards or absorbed by the anode rather than getting scattered?
 
Depends on the energy - if the particle energy is low enough there will be minimal scattering - but as the particle energy increases more and more scattering will be observed.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top