Why Can't All Intersection Points Be Found for Vector-Valued Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SOHAWONG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that solving the equation r1(t) = r2(t) for vector-valued functions does not yield all intersection points due to the nature of the parameterization. Specifically, the functions r1(t) = and r2(t) = illustrate that while the circles they describe intersect at (0, √3/2) and (0, -√3/2), the parameter t does not correspond to the same values for both functions at these points. The solution requires considering different parameters for each function to accurately identify intersection points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector-valued functions in two-dimensional space.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of parameterization and its implications in geometry.
  • Basic skills in solving equations involving trigonometric identities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of parameterization in vector-valued functions.
  • Study the properties of trigonometric functions, particularly sine and cosine.
  • Learn about intersections of curves in parametric form.
  • Investigate the implications of time as a parameter in motion along circular paths.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying vector calculus or parametric equations will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the geometric interpretation of vector-valued functions.

SOHAWONG
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Q:Suppose that r1(t) and r2(t) are vector-valued functions in 2-
space. Explain why solving the equation r1(t) = r2(t) may not produce
all of the points where the graphs of these functions intersect.

In usual function,i always find the intersection by f(x)=g(x)


but how come we can't find all the points when these are vector-valued functions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider r1(t)= <cos(t)+ 1/2, sin(t)> and r2(t)= <cos(t)- 1/2, sin(t)> . Do you see that r1 gives vectors that rotate around a circle of radius 1 with center at (-1/2, 0) and that r2 gives vectors that rotate around a circle of radius 1 with center at (1/2, 0)?

Those circles intersect at \left(0,\sqrt{3}/2\right) and \left(0, -\sqrt{3}/2\right) but if you set r1 and r2 equal, you get <cos(t)+ 1/2, sin(t)>= <cos(t)- 1/2, sin(t)> so that cos(t)+ 1/2= cos(t)- 1/2 which is not true for any t!

The problem is that the two circles reach the points of intersection at different t. If you think of these as two object moving around circular paths with t as time, then the two paths cross but the objects are at those points of intersection at different times.

You would do better to write <cos(t)+ 1/2, sin(t)>= <cos(s)- 1/2, sin(s)> so that you have two equations, cos(t)+ 1/2= cos(s)- 1/2 and sin(t)= sin(s) for the two unknown numbers. Obviously, s= t will satisfy the second equation but then the first is unsolvable. Since it is true that sin(\pi/2- x)= sin(x) s= \pi/2- t will also work. But then cos(s)= cos(\pi/2- t)= cos(t) and we have the same problem- the two cosines cancel leaving 1/2= -1/2 which is impossible.

It is also true that sin(x- \pi)= sin(x) so we could have s= \pi- t Then cos(t)+ 1/2= cos(s)- 1/2 becomes cos(t)+ 1/2= cos(\pi- t)- 1/2= -cos(t)- 1/2 or 2cos(t)= -1, cos(t)= -1/2 so that t= 2\pi/3 and s= \pi- 2\pi/3= \pi/3. Now we have &lt;cos(t)+ 1/2, sin(t)&gt;= &lt;cos(2\pi/3)+ 1/2, sin(2\pi/3)&gt;= &lt;-1/2+ 1/2, -\sqrt{3}/2&gt;= &lt;0, -\sqrt{3}/2&gt; and &lt;cos(s)- 1/2, sin(s)&gt;= &lt;cos(\pi/3)- 1/2, sin(\pi/3)&gt;= &lt;1/2- 1/2, +\sqrt{3}/2&gt;= &lt;0, \sqrt{3}/2&gt;.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thx a lot!
so,would it only happen in vector-valued function?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K