Why Can't I Resolve Forces Upward?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldfish9776
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Resolution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the inability to resolve forces in the upward direction in a given scenario involving a car and tow ropes. Participants emphasize that for a stationary object, all forces must sum to zero, indicating that downward forces must equal upward forces. A free body diagram (FBD) is suggested as a tool to visualize the forces, revealing that there are no upward forces acting on the system. Misinterpretations of the FBD are noted, with one participant admitting to incorrectly sketching the forces. Ultimately, understanding the correct application of force resolution is crucial for solving the problem.
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


why can't I resolve the forces in upward direction ? ( as in the sketched diagram)
the book showed that the (y component ) forces are in downward direction ... why can't be in upward direction ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150913_211812[1].jpg
    IMG_20150913_211812[1].jpg
    32 KB · Views: 386
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think a situation where the car is not moving. Then all the forces must sum up to zero. If you would take y component forces upward then you would have sum of forces that is not zero. There should be acceleration and after infinity of time cars speed would be infinity?
Downward force should be same as upward force until the (600N) is bigger than friction.
 
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


why can't I resolve the forces in upward direction ? ( as in the sketched diagram)
Why do you want to do this? o_O

the book showed that the (y component ) forces are in downward direction ... why can't be in upward direction ?

If you draw a free body diagram of the tow ropes, it should become fairly obvious that there are no forces in the upward (sic) direction.

After all, you can't push on a rope. :wink:
 
SteamKing said:
Why do you want to do this? o_O
If you draw a free body diagram of the tow ropes, it should become fairly obvious that there are no forces in the upward (sic) direction.

After all, you can't push on a rope. :wink:
I drew a free body diagram( pencil -sketched ) , but i gt the forces are in upwards direction . Lol
 
goldfish9776 said:
I drew a free body diagram( pencil -sketched ) , but i gt the forces are in upwards direction . Lol
The you drew the FBD wrong.
 
SteamKing said:
The you drew the FBD wrong.
Which part is wrong?i couldn't figure it out
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
612
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Back
Top