Why Can't Quantum Numbers Include Half Integers?

HiggsBoson1
Messages
10
Reaction score
4
I don't understand why quantum numbers can not be divided into half integers and so on. The books I have read do not give clear explanations. Would anyone mind helping me understand this? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What quantum numbers are you talking about?

If you are talking about spin quantum numbers then any decent book on QM will prove from the angular momentum commutation relations why its quantized.

If you are talking about solutions to Schroedinger's equation then that is not always quantized, and when it is it depends entirely on the Hamiltonian:
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/Users/smithb/website/coursenotes/qi/QILectureNotes3.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes HiggsBoson1
bhobba said:
What quantum numbers are you talking about?

If you are talking about spin quantum numbers then any decent book on QM will prove from the angular momentum commutation relations why its quantized.

If you are talking about solutions to Schroedinger's equation then that is not always quantized, and when it is it depends entirely on the Hamiltonian:
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/Users/smithb/website/coursenotes/qi/QILectureNotes3.pdf

Thanks
Bill
That was really helpful! Thanks a lot! :)
 
HiggsBoson1 said:
I don't understand why quantum numbers can not be divided into half integers and so on. The books I have read do not give clear explanations. Would anyone mind helping me understand this? Thanks!

The Schrodinger equation: H \psi = E \psi can be solved for arbitrary values of E, but when E is not an eigenvalue of the hamiltonian, then \psi will be unnormalizable--it will blow up at infinity, or at the origin, or somewhere. For example, a solution to the free particle Schrodinger equation with E < 0 is: \psi = e^{\hbar K x}, which corresponds to an energy of -\hbar^2 K^2/(2 m).

The differential equations for the wave function are forced to have discrete values by boundary conditions: to make sure that the wave function is single-valued in the whole domain, and to make sure that the integral of |\psi|^2 is finite.
 
  • Like
Likes HiggsBoson1
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top