Why can't you form a sixth Platonic solid by identifying faces of tetrahedrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solids
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] platonic solids

Homework Statement



Let f_1 be a face of one tetrahedron and let f_2 be a face on a second same-sized tetrahedron. Why do you not get a sixth Platonic solid when you identify f_1 and f_2, which you can do because they are the same triangle?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a platonic solid, the same number of faces have to meet at each vertex.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top