Why derive electric field produced by a rod?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
damosuz
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Is there a practical utility to derive the electric field produced by a charged rod (and the 1/r dependence at great distance)? I know it can be useful to derive the electric field produced by a large plate since you can then show that the field between close parallel plates that are oppositely charged is uniform, which is useful info for experimenters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
damosuz said:
Is there a practical utility to derive the electric field produced by a charged rod (and the 1/r dependence at great distance)? .
What is the electric field 50 feet below a 700 kV interstate high-voltage power line (= long rod)? (ac power lines are actually 3 phase).

What is the minimum diameter of a high voltage power line to prevent corona?

Bob S
 
I meant the electric field produced by a static charge on a rod, not the intensity of the electric field in the radiation produced by the ac current in a wire (which is 1/r dependent too).
 
damosuz said:
I meant the electric field produced by a static charge on a rod, not the intensity of the electric field in the radiation produced by the ac current in a wire (which is 1/r dependent too).
At 50 or 60 Hz, the radiation (like from antenna) is minimal, so the power line problem becomes quasi-electrostatic. The high-tension power line hazard is the quasi-electrostatic field, not a radiation field.

Bob S
 
Bob S said:
At 50 or 60 Hz, the radiation (like from antenna) is minimal, so the power line problem becomes quasi-electrostatic. The high-tension power line hazard is the quasi-electrostatic field, not a radiation field.

Thank you for your help. Do you have any reference about this?