Why Did the Big Bang Create Irregular Bumps Instead of Expanding Uniformly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sydius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang
AI Thread Summary
At the moment of the Big Bang, all matter was indeed infinitely compressed and dimensionless, but this state was not uniform due to inherent quantum fluctuations in energy density. These fluctuations, although minuscule at first, were magnified during the inflationary period, leading to the irregular bumps observed in the universe today. As inflation ceased, denser regions of matter began to collapse under gravity, forming stars and galaxies. The misconception that the universe started bumpy arises from the misunderstanding of the Big Bang as an explosion within pre-existing spacetime, rather than the origin of space and time itself. Ultimately, the irregularities we observe are a result of these quantum fluctuations being frozen and expanded during the early universe's rapid inflation.
Sydius
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
On the timeline of everything, at point 0, all matter was infinitely compressed and dimensionless, right? Then, it exploded, and produced the Big Bang…

We know that the original mass produced by the big bang should have been very bumpy to produce galaxies like it did, and this was confirmed by those microwave readings.

My question, though, is, if all matter was infinitely compressed and dimensionless at time 0, then why did it form irregular bumps, and not expand uniformly? Dimensionless implies no bumps, doesn't it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sydius said:
On the timeline of everything, at point 0, all matter was infinitely compressed and dimensionless, right? Then, it exploded, and produced the Big Bang…

It's best not to visualize the Big Bang as an explosion because that gives the impression that it was some sort of event in a pre-existing spacetime. In fact, it was the origin of space and time itself.


We know that the original mass produced by the big bang should have been very bumpy to produce galaxies like it did, and this was confirmed by those microwave readings.

We don't think the universe started bumpy. In fact, if you go back far enough, matter as we know it didn't even exist. Rather, we think that there were fluctuations in a quantum field that eventually gave rise to the fluctuations in matter. These fluctuations were thought to have been frozen and expanded to large scales by a process known as inflation. Later, after inflation had long since ceased, these fluctuations were able to collapse under their own gravity and form the many structures (like galaxies and clusters) that we see around us today.
 
Not exactly, Sydius. Space Tiger gave a wonderful explanation that I can only elaborate upon. The t=0 universe was extremely homogenous, but, unavoidably included quantum fluctuations in its energy density. Inflation froze and magnified those tiny fluctuations as the current universe unfolded. The denser regions collapsed to form stars and collections of stars [proto galaxies].
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Back
Top