Why do clouds hold their shape in the wind?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Echo 6 Sierra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form
AI Thread Summary
Clouds maintain their shape due to the density and cohesiveness of water droplets, which are influenced by their dipolar nature. Unlike steam from boiling water that dissipates quickly, clouds consist of numerous small water droplets that are held together by their slight polarization, allowing them to resist being torn apart by wind. The visibility of clouds is a result of light refraction and reflection within these droplets, which occupy only a small fraction of the cloud's volume. While clouds can be affected by wind shear, they typically remain cohesive due to the attraction between water droplets. The formation of clouds involves complex processes, including the presence of cloud condensation nuclei and turbulent updrafts that help keep the droplets suspended in the air.
Echo 6 Sierra
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
It's a partly cloudy day here and I was checking out the clouds as they flew by. Noticing the shapes of the clouds, I was wondering how they held their shape instead of being just a haze of water vapor when blown. When a pot of water boils the steam keeps its billowy cloud shape for a small distance and then just turns into a shapeless nothing. Is it that they are dense enough to resist being torn apart by the wind and pushed along en masse?

...the answer my friend, is...
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Look closer next time you get a chance. Perhaps even with binoculars. Some clouds are well-defined, but some are wispy. The ones that are well-defined are often well-defined because they are growing.

And clouds can get pulled apart by shear, but only pulled apart: Shear won't cause clouds to dissipate because the clouds ride with the wnd.
 
Interesting question. You don't find the same cohesiveness in smoke. As smoke rises it dissipates rapidly. I am not a physicist, but it is my understanding that because water molecules are dipolar, water droplets are slightly polarized and act like small magnets, attracting each other. However, droplets are small (commonly only a few tens of microns in diameter, a property largely controlled by the size of cloud condensation nuclei, which is another complex topic) and commonly too far from each other to coalesce due to that attraction. They are small enough that despite being heavier than still air, even the slightest breeze will keep them aloft. In fact, there may need to be no breeze at all, with cloud droplets suspended in Brownian motion. (This also applies to ice crystals in clouds.) It is the proximity of water droplets to each other that allows you to see clouds. As light impinges upon a cloud, it is refracted and reflected in all directions, rendering what is mostly composed of air, opaque (water droplets comprise only about a millionth of the volume of the cloud). As clouds are constantly changing shape due to wind shear, the cohesiveness is largely maintained due to the resistance of this shearing by the dipolar property of water.

As far as the pot of water is concerned, turbulent flow is created by the upwelling of steam from the pot. The steam condenses rapidly a few millimeters from the pot forming water droplets. Water droplets rapidly move upward due to the turbulent updraft. However, what seems like dissipation, may be due more to the fact that there are too few water droplets to cause opaqueness. Maybe there is just enough dissipation to cause transparency, but maybe less dissipation from the pot of boiling water than you think.

A few useful websites:
http://www.sundog.clara.co.uk/droplets/clouds.htm
http://www.espere.net/Unitedkingdom/water/uk_cloudform.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_(molecule )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Back
Top