Why Do Different Least Square Fit Methods Yield Different Results?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pack2themoon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fit Square
pack2themoon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, very excited to be here and this my first post.

I have a question about data fitting by using least square fit, and the problem is:
I have a experimental data set(xi, yi), and I want to fit it to single exponential y,
now i tried two ways:
1. do linear least square fit to (xi, log(yi))
2. directly search minimal for sigma (yi-y)^2

The resulted fittings are different, the 1st one only looks fit on log scale, and the 2nd only looks fit on linear scale.

Can you give me any hint what is the root of the problem? and which way makes physical sense?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which is better depends on the underlying physics.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top