Why Do Different Sized Balls Travel the Same Distance in a Physics Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amurray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Project
AI Thread Summary
Different sized balls travel the same distance in a physics experiment due to the conservation of energy principle, where potential energy converts to kinetic energy and back. The experiment involves releasing balls of varying sizes down an incline and measuring how far they roll back up, showing that, ideally, they should reach the same height if friction is negligible. Friction does play a role, and factors such as surface contact area and material softness can affect the distance traveled. To illustrate these concepts to a 3rd grader, using a sliding object instead of a rolling ball can effectively demonstrate the impact of friction. Understanding these principles helps clarify why the results are consistent across different ball sizes.
amurray
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello All,
I am helping my 3rd grade nephew on a science project. I am trying to decide what the expected results would be & why. The project is run of track that is inclined at both ends w/ a 30" straight run in the middle. The ends are 3" high at 30 degrees. He is releasing different size balls (golf, 1" plastic & marble) down the incline at one end. Then along the straight track and measuring how far up the incline on the other end the ball rolls. After five trials of each ball they all went the same distance up the incline.

I know the math and physics behind this is way above 3rd grade, but want to understand it for myself and then give him a basic explanation of what is going on. I broke out my college physics books but was not able to puzzle through it.

Any help is greatly appreciated. If I should post this to another forum I aplologize.

Andy Murray
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of energy. Every object starts with some potential energy due to its initial height. As it goes down, that potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. As it goes back up, that kinetic energy is converted back into potential energy. If there were no friction whatsoever, total energy would stay the same and the object (of any size, shape or composition) would rise to exactly the height it started from.

Of course there is always some friction but it sounds like your mechanism is pretty good. You are probably getting little enough friction that all the balls are moving in the same way. (Conservation of energy- though not necessarily mentioned in those terms- is probably the point of the experiment.) Galileo's famous experiment dropping balls of different weight off the leaning tower of Pisa was basically the same experiment. (Actually, there is no evidence that Galileo actual dropped things from the leaning tower of Pisa. He mainly used inclined planes just like you are doing.)
 
Thanks for the assistance. So I completely understand, without friction all the balls if started from the same place on the incline should raise to the same place on the end incline? Including friction, the heavier balls should go slightly lower then the lighter balls?

Thanks again

Andy Murray
 
I wouldn't necessarily say "heavier". Might be other things like "bigger so they make more contact with the track."
 
Or softer so there's more rolling resistance...
 
I think Nate has brought up an important point in explaining to your 3rd grade nephew. Find something other than a ball (maybe close to the same weight as the golf ball); an oblect that will slide instead of rolling to show that the area of contact and surface "roughness" causes friction (hence slows it down).

Just an idea.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top