Why do eddy currents cause oscillations to die away quickly?

AI Thread Summary
Eddy currents in a metallic disc swinging between magnetic poles cause rapid oscillation decay due to two main effects. First, these currents generate a magnetic field opposing the original field, creating a resistive force that slows the disc down. Second, the energy lost from the oscillation is dissipated as heat within the disc, attributed to the heating effect of the eddy currents. Both explanations are valid and complement each other, as they describe different aspects of the same phenomenon. Understanding these interactions clarifies why oscillations die away quickly in this scenario.
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
A metallic disc attached to a rod swings between two opposite magnetic poles, and its oscillation dies away very quickly. I thought this happens because the eddy currents formed inside the disc are established in a direction that would cause their magnetic field to oppose the magnetic field which induced them, causing a resistive force on the disc, just like air resistance but much stronger. And since the amplitude is a measure of the total mechanical energy of the disc, and work is done against the "resistive forces", the amplitude decreases. However, my A level book says otherwise. According to my book, eddy currents cause a heating effect which dissipates energy in the disc causing the oscillations to die away. Thoughts on this please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both explanations are correct.
 
dauto said:
Both explanations are correct.

Could you please elaborate further?
 
Both things you said are correct. The induced currents produce a magnetic field that opposes the preexisting field forcing the pendulum to slowdown. The energy of the pendulum is dissipated which means it is transformed into heat. That heat is deposited in the metallic disk because the eddy currents have a heating effect. Both things are true. One explanation does not preclude the other explanation. They are both correct.
 
dauto said:
Both things you said are correct. The induced currents produce a magnetic field the oppose the preexisting field forcing the pendulum to slowdown. The energy of the pendulum is dissipated which means it is transformed into heat. That heat is deposited in the metallic disk because the eddy currents have a heating effect. Both things are true. One explanation does not preclude the other explanation. They are both correct.

But a heating effect would be caused by the current anyway, regardless of its direction, right?
 
MohammedRady97 said:
But a heating effect would be caused by the current anyway, regardless of its direction, right?

Yes, but only one direction works. Lenz law gives you the correct direction.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
May be an analogy will help. If you shoot a bullet into a water tank the water will slow down the bullet. You can say that the drag produces a force that slows down the bullet but you can also say that turbulent motion converts the energy of the bullet into heat. Both the force and the energy points of view are correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
60
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top