Why do ice skaters bend at an angle when taking a turn at high speed?

AI Thread Summary
Ice skaters lean at an angle during high-speed turns to counteract inertia, which tends to push them outward. This leaning creates an inward roll torque that balances the outward torque caused by centripetal force. The angle of lean is determined by the formula θ = tan-1(v² / (g r)), where v is speed, g is gravitational acceleration, and r is the radius of the turn. Unlike motorcyclists, this phenomenon is not related to gyroscopic effects; instead, it involves the application of force at the skater's base rather than their center of mass. Properly adjusting the lean angle allows skaters to maintain circular motion without experiencing net torque.
R Power
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Why do ice skaters bend at an angle when taking a turn at high speed?
I saw some pictures of ice skaters leaning while taking turn...in case of motorcyclists it is due to gyro effect but what in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is essentially the same effect. It is necessary to counteract inertia, which would tend to keep them going straight.
 
is there any analysis of this effect (as that of gyro there exists based on angular momentum, active reactive couple) ?
Why they would lean? Inertia would still throw them forward while turning theorotically!
 
Intertia "throws" them toward the outside of the curve.
 
Leaning is done so that the outwards roll torque related to centrepital force is countered by an inwards roll torque related to gravity.

Lean angle (from vertical) θ = tan-1(v2 / (g r) ).

This is unrelated to any gyroscopic effect. You could replace the wheels and tires of a bicycle with rounded skate bladed and be able to glide and steer on ice conventionally, without any gyroscopic effects.
 
Last edited:
Force required for circular motion should be applied on the centre of mass, but for an ice skater it is applied at their base. To avoid spinning outwards they lean in. The effect of this is to move your centre of mass away from vertical with the point of contact with the floor, which provides an opposing torque (the reaction force from the floor no longer coincides with your centre of mass).

If you get the angle right you have circular motion and no net torque.

(Basically what rcgldr said but wordier).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top