Why do objects bounce when considering momentum and Newton's third law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stromthetroll
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An object bounces due to the interaction of forces as described by Newton's third law, where the force exerted by the ground on the object can exceed the force of gravity acting downward. When a falling object impacts the ground, it compresses, creating an upward compression force that can surpass gravitational force. This results in an upward acceleration of the object after impact. The discussion emphasizes that the contact time during the impact is short, allowing for significant forces to be exerted. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why objects bounce rather than simply fall without rebounding.
Stromthetroll
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Why does an object bounce when speaking about momentum and Newton's third law
I would like to say it is because the upward force (the force the object falling enacts on the ground and the ground acts on the object) is greater than the force of gravity, which would be impossible in an object that is dropped not thrown. My second thought is that the momentum is greater in the falling object but would that cause it to bounce and if so why? I am not asking about the elasticity or the molecular structure just bouncing and how it relates to the third law.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stromthetroll said:
Why does an object bounce when speaking about momentum and Newton's third law
I would like to say it is because the upward force (the force the object falling enacts on the ground and the ground acts on the object) is greater than the force of gravity, which would be impossible in an object that is dropped not thrown.

Welcome to PF.

Who says that the force the ground exerts on the object can't be greater than the force of gravity? The contact time can be very short.
 
The force the ground exerts on the object is the same as the force the object exerts on the ground third law of motion the only force downward is gravity so all of it is exerted on the ground.
 
Thanks for the welcome hopefully i don't have too many questions
 
Stromthetroll said:
The force the ground exerts on the object is the same as the force the object exerts on the ground third law of motion the only force downward is gravity so all of it is exerted on the ground.
When the ball is at its lowest point (somewhat flattened onto the ground by the impact), the lower part of the ball is under compression. So the forces acting on the mass centre of the ball are gravity down and a compression force up. The forces at the ground are the same compression down from the ball and an equal reaction from the ground. Since this compressive force exceeds gravity the ball accelerates upwards.
 
haruspex said:
When the ball is at its lowest point (somewhat flattened onto the ground by the impact), the lower part of the ball is under compression. So the forces acting on the mass centre of the ball are gravity down and a compression force up. The forces at the ground are the same compression down from the ball and an equal reaction from the ground. Since this compressive force exceeds gravity the ball accelerates upwards.

I did not even think of compression forces thank you for your aid.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top