Why do \pi\^{\pm} have different charges than \pi\^{0}?

Dahaka14
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
How is it that \pi\^{\pm} have charges \pm e and \pi\^{0} has a charge of 0? The \pi\^{+} has one up quark and an anti-down quark, which doesn't add up to zero (same deal goes for \pi\^{-}, and the \pi\^{0} has a linear combination that doesn't seem to add up to zero.

Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pi + has as you say, one up and one anti-down which gives you +2/3 + 1/3 = 1

You are saying (The \pi ^+
has one up quark and an anti-down quark, which doesn't add up to zero ) But the pi + should have CHARGE = 1e! As you said in the sentence before this one.

Maybe try to be more consistent to yourself.. try again.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top