Why Do Rocket Hobbyists Use Non-Stoichiometric Mixes in Propellants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adoado
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of potassium nitrate and sorbitol as propellants in rocket motors, raising questions about the use of non-stoichiometric quantities of reagents. Non-stoichiometric amounts can lead to leftover reactants and potentially enhance reaction completeness. It is clarified that standard combustion typically requires gaseous oxygen, while iron oxide may serve a different role, possibly as a catalyst rather than an oxygen source. The effectiveness of iron oxide in the reaction is questioned, suggesting that it may not provide sufficient oxygen without complex reactions. Understanding these chemical interactions is crucial for optimizing rocket propellant performance.
adoado
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
The combination of potassium nitrate and sorbitol and commonly used by hobbyists as a propellant for rocket motors.

The combustion equation is given below:
KNO3.jpg


I have a few very simple questions based on the chemistry of such a reaction.

Firstly, many people do not use stoichiometric quantities of each reagent. Why is this? I thought the idea was to get the 'exact' amounts as to optimize the reaction? Or is this simply optimizing the efficiency of the utilization of the reagents into products?

Secondly, there is an oxygen term there; does this need to be available as a gas? For example, a lot of people seem to add Iron Oxide to this mix, probably to give this oxygen component. My question is, why iron oxide - can anything with an oxygen work?

Thanks for reading,
Adrian
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
adoado said:
The combination of potassium nitrate and sorbitol and commonly used by hobbyists as a propellant for rocket motors.

The combustion equation is given below:
KNO3.jpg


I have a few very simple questions based on the chemistry of such a reaction.

Firstly, many people do not use stoichiometric quantities of each reagent. Why is this? I thought the idea was to get the 'exact' amounts as to optimize the reaction? Or is this simply optimizing the efficiency of the utilization of the reagents into products?

Secondly, there is an oxygen term there; does this need to be available as a gas? For example, a lot of people seem to add Iron Oxide to this mix, probably to give this oxygen component. My question is, why iron oxide - can anything with an oxygen work?

Thanks for reading,
Adrian

Non stoichiometric amounts just means some of the reactants will be left over. This could also shift the equilibrium and get a more complete reaction with respect to other reactants.

Yes, standard combustion uses gaseous oxygen. I'm not sure about the iron oxide chemistry. It may act as a catalyst, or alter the actual reaction mechanism.

I doubt iron oxide is the oxygen source, because that would require a large amount, and require some sort of splitting reaction.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top