Why do the d, f orbitals of transition metals have less reactivity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MophiA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Transition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of filling electron orbitals, specifically the sequence of n=5 and n=6 orbitals versus n=4 orbitals. It highlights that n=4 orbitals are significantly smaller and closer to the nucleus, yet they possess higher energy than the n=5 and n=6 orbitals. This raises questions about the concept of localization in relation to these orbitals. Additionally, the conversation touches on reactivity, questioning what the n=4 orbitals are less reactive compared to, given their energy levels and size. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the intricate relationship between orbital size, energy, and reactivity in atomic structure.
MophiA
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thinking about filling sequence 5s -> 4d or 6s -> 4f, the n=4 orbitals are way smaller than n=5 or 6.

Does this mean "localized"?

Even though the n=4 orbitals are way smaller, close to nucleus, these orbitals have more energy than n=5, 6 orbitals above.

What makes it less reactive?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
less reactive compared to what?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top