Why Do These Mathematical Expressions Seem Unequal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expressions
Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
In order to see the problem here, you need to refer to following link:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/TurbineSpeed/Picture402887.jpg

I understand how they got the expression in the numerator. What I cannot figure out is how they got the denominator.

By their math, (x-4)(x+1) + (x+1)(x-4) = (x+1)(x-4)

This does not seem correct. Give a value to x such as x = 6, and:

(2)(7) + (7)(2) = 14 + 14 = 28

Now if we apply this value to the right member, we get:

(7)(2) = 14.

14 is NOT equal to 28.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Holocene,
a/b + c/b = (a+c)/b
As an example, if you have an eighth of a pizza and have another (one-eighth sized) slice of pizza, you have eaten 2/8=1/4 of the pizza, not 2/16 = 1/8.
 
Slider,

Thank you, but how can (x-4)(x+1) + (x+1)(x-4) be equal to (x+1)(x-4)?
 
WOW! Apparently I had forgotten that when you add fractions you do NOT add the denominators together. Instead, they must simply be equal. Man, I feel stupid for being tripped up over this one.

Slider, thanks, I can't believe I forgot this simple rule.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top