Why do two masses move towards each other under gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyoma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that two masses represented in a gravitational field diagram would not move towards each other. It clarifies that point masses do not experience the gravitational field they generate, which complicates the understanding of their interaction. When considering two unequal masses, the smaller mass will move towards the larger mass due to gravity, while two equal masses will not move towards each other without external forces. The diagram in question is deemed accurate for a test mass in a combined field but does not apply when considering the bodies as aggregates. Understanding the internal gravitational fields and their cancellation is crucial for grasping the dynamics of mass interactions.
Kyoma
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



twofield.gif


This picture represents the gravitational field lines for a pair of masses. The problem I have with this picture is that it seems to indicate that the 2 masses would not move towards each other, which is surely wrong since gravity would cause two masses to move towards each other. Is there an explanation for this? Much help appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyoma said:
The problem I have with this picture is that it seems to indicate that the 2 masses would not move towards each other, which is surely wrong since gravity would cause two masses to move towards each other.
A point mass is not subject to the field lines it generates. If you want to consider each body as a mass distributed over a volume then you would need to take into account the forces that maintain the structure of each body.
 
haruspex said:
A point mass is not subject to the field lines it generates. If you want to consider each body as a mass distributed over a volume then you would need to take into account the forces that maintain the structure of each body.

Let's us ignore point masses. So, I presume you're saying that if I have two masses, m1 and m2, whereby m2 is significantly larger than m1, m1 will move towards m2 whereas if I have two masses of equal mass and assuming no other external forces, they will not move towards each other?
 
Kyoma said:

Homework Statement



twofield.gif


This picture represents the gravitational field lines for a pair of masses. The problem I have with this picture is that it seems to indicate that the 2 masses would not move towards each other, which is surely wrong since gravity would cause two masses to move towards each other. Is there an explanation for this? Much help appreciated. Thanks!

Where did you get the picture from? It resembles the field pattern you would get from two equal strength repelling particles/objects, not what you would get from attracting objects such as masses.
 
Last edited:
Kyoma said:
Let's us ignore point masses. So, I presume you're saying that if I have two masses, m1 and m2, whereby m2 is significantly larger than m1, m1 will move towards m2 whereas if I have two masses of equal mass and assuming no other external forces, they will not move towards each other?
No, that's not what I was saying at all.
The diagram you show is quite correct for a third body (a 'test' mass) exposed to the combined field. But it treats the two bodies in the picture as point masses, and you want to understand what happens if you consider them instead as aggregates.
That gets complicated because you now have to consider the field inside the body. Right in the middle, of course, the field due to that body cancels out, and you only feel the field due to the other body. Elsewhere inside the body, there is some field due to it, but integrating over the whole body it will still cancel. Therefore the body taken as a whole does not feel its own field, and the diagram is not relevant to this case.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top