Why Do We Get an Einstein Cross Instead of a Skewed Ring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unredeemed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein
AI Thread Summary
Einstein crosses occur due to the specific alignment of a background source, lensing mass, and observer, which creates multiple images of the source. This phenomenon is distinct from a skewed ring because the alignment must be nearly perfect for a cross to form, while a skewed ring results from less precise alignment. The discussion references Hartle's book, which provides a detailed explanation of these gravitational lensing effects. Understanding the geometry of light paths in gravitational fields is crucial for grasping why crosses form instead of rings. The topic highlights the complexities of gravitational lensing in astrophysics.
Unredeemed
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Why do we ever get Einstein crosses? I realize it is because the alignment is not right, but why do we get a cross because of this instead of just a skewed ring?

Thanks,
Jamie
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Unredeemed said:
Why do we ever get Einstein crosses? I realize it is because the alignment is not right, but why do we get a cross because of this instead of just a skewed ring?

Thanks,
Jamie

Hartle's book Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity has a nice treatment of this. I can look it up on Monday.
 
George Jones said:
Hartle's book Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity has a nice treatment of this. I can look it up on Monday.

That would be great, thank you.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top