Why Do We Need to Convert Series to Partial Fractions for Evaluation?

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
Now yesterday I got help in realizing how to evaluate the sums of certain series, but while doing it I never got the reason behind why we take a series such as: \sum from k=1 to ∞ 1/k(k+3), I know how to solve the sum, but why do we have to convert it to a set of partial fractions in order to do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the simplest way of finding the limit of its partial sums, by the telescoping series.
 
sharks said:
It's the simplest way of finding the limit of its partial sums, by the telescoping series.

ok, but what happens if the partial fraction that you end up with doesn't have a minus sign in it, then how would the telescoping occur?
 
trap101 said:
ok, but what happens if the partial fraction that you end up with doesn't have a minus sign in it, then how would the telescoping occur?
In that case, it would not be a telescoping series.

The definition of the telescoping series is that the limit of the partial sums must be equal to the sum of the first and last terms only.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
989
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
930
Back
Top